Ok, some one ask who was better LT or Bush! Every one said LT! But who would do better as a Wide Reciver?
2007-10-26 07:55:08 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Probably LT! He is super fast, he can definatly juke, and already being a running back he can chach already! Bush is so overrated! Hes not that great. LT totaly creams Bush!
2007-10-26 07:57:36 · answer #1 · answered by skatefoo123 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
L.T. is definitely better than Bush as a every down,between the tackles, carry the load kind of back......HANDS DOWN!! However as a receiver......hmmmm. Reggie Bush has always struck me as a playmaker.....not the best really at anything or any positon. He can run the ball inside.....mind you, only on draws and delays.....run outside on the edge.....everyone in the NFL knows that.....punt return......kick return....catch out the backfield.....he can even take a hit(last year against Philly...that looked like it REALLY hurt). So when you ask who would be better between the two as a receiver.....I'd have to say Bush would have the potential to be better than L.T. in that position, because of his overall talent and playmaking ability.
2007-10-26 15:58:06 · answer #2 · answered by Chasein co 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pick any position on the field, and the odds are that LT is better at it than Bush.
Bush is a good change-of-pace guy, but he's also one of the most overrated players coming out of college in the past couple of decades and will never - never - be a great everydown back like Tomlinson.
Every week, the Texans look smarter and smarter for not taking him with that top choice.
2007-10-26 15:07:23 · answer #3 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush would probably make a better WR since his receiving skills and route running are what he does best.
Since both are running backs it really doesn't matter. As a RB he has nothing on LT.
2007-10-26 15:47:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
as a wide receiver i would go with Bush. He had more receptions last year than any year LT had. and more yards last year than any of Lt's years. and the speed factor goes to Reggie too.
2007-10-26 15:07:15 · answer #5 · answered by Tom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say Bush. I mean L.T. was a great linebacker and had good hands but I don't know if he had the speed to be a receiver. He WAS however, better at getting hookers for opposing team members than anybody in the game!
2007-10-26 15:04:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush
did you see the 88 yard rec last year in the playoffs ?
2007-10-26 15:30:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
L.T. is the best HB in the NFL.......He's the best player in the nfl.
Bush is overated.Lt all the way.
Lets Go Chargers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
P.S. ladainian tomlinson is also a better reciever
2007-10-26 16:34:22 · answer #8 · answered by Molly M 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LT
o ya i saw the playoffs, when that fool got smashed against the eagles
2007-10-26 15:47:48 · answer #9 · answered by balla_2552 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BOTH OF THESE PLAYERS DO WELL AS SHORT PASS RECIEVERS, SO ITS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO SAY WHICH ONE WOULD BE A BETTER WIDE RECIEVER. COIN FLIP: BUSH!
2007-10-26 15:07:45 · answer #10 · answered by Chuck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋