The Political parties are the same with little change. We have not had a president to make a dramastic change in over 100yrs. This system is designed to keep us fooled and occupied with bull,while they continue to get rich and milk the citizens of this country. Please wake up. We need leaders not followers.
2007-10-26 07:40:19 · 10 answers · asked by Gee 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Uhh... Habeas Corpus had been around since 1215. Thats a solid 550 years before our country. I'd say it was a drastic change to get rid of it.
As for the clown that praised FDR. If it weren't for his socialist implementations like social security, we'd still have the initiative as a people because we wouldn't be tracked by our social security number (which was promised to never be used as ID because the voters of the day considered a violation of their privacy!)
2007-10-26 07:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is the problem. Everybody VOTES when a Presidential election comes around but the writing is already on the wall by then. Everyone needs to vote in their community elections, state elections and so on...... Your State Reps. and Senators play a bigger part in your lives than the president does. Those are the ones that need to be de-encumbered. If you can choose the right middle people who reflect your wishes and values then it gets to the President if a ruling is needed. People need to understand that the Presidents hands are tied without being able to work with Congress. Look at it now! The Congress is smiling all the way to the bank because they got the majority back. But has it helped US or hurt US! Power hungry mongrels need to be outed starting at the bottom.
2007-10-26 08:39:19 · answer #2 · answered by My Baby! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is a loaded question because you are automatically assuming that all presidents have not changed anything. But how can you make such a general comment? The last 100 years? What about Roosevelt's declaration to send U.S. troops to War World II, Lydon B. Johnson's decision to send 1,000's of troops to Vietnam? What about the 30,000 men and women appointed to positions within the government at the beginning of every administration? Or about the appointment of Supreme court justices who make landmark decisions such as roe vs. wade, Brown vs. the Topeka Board of education! How can you possibly feel that electing a president is a waste of time? It's really sad how you don't appreciate this right! There are people who have died and are dying for the right to participate in the electoral process in their country!
2007-10-26 08:02:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's not much choice> Vote for the 1 that hasn't sold out the citizens for illegals> That's a start>Vote out the 1s that's don't support the citizens>
2007-10-26 07:46:30 · answer #4 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are Presidents who have REALLY changed things, both for the better (like FDR) and for the worse (like the current assh*le). While another social champion like FDR may not be running for president anytime soon, it's still our responsibility to try as hard as we can to keep the assh*les out of office...
2007-10-26 07:49:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because most vote for flip-floppers.
Vote Ron Paul, he is the only consistent choice. Regardless of if you accept all his view points, consistency itself will make better progress than what we do have (or have had).
2007-10-26 08:26:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
in case you incredibly desire to be conscious of what has to get replaced, study Eric Jon Phelp's e book, "Vatican Assassins". you will possibly get a greater suited attitude, particularly of in basic terms rambling on approximately technologies.
2016-10-14 03:02:03 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the American way,Vote for change.Vote before even that right is taken away.
2007-10-26 07:51:31 · answer #8 · answered by dennyh65 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we need the general public to be leaders and not followers. I refuse to be a sheep and worship a politician. I know what's best for my life, not them.
Ron Paul, please return my freedom to me!!
2007-10-26 08:37:44 · answer #9 · answered by idontknow 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You're crazy...when we had George Bush for President....I mean the first one, things were fine....when we had CLinton for President....I mean the first one, things were still fine...when we had George Bush for President....I mean the second one, things were still fine...When we had Clinton--well, you know what I mean.
2007-10-26 07:44:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋