English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
-Henry Ford

Do you agree? Why or why not? What specific aspects of the banking and monetary system do you think Ford was referring to?

2007-10-26 06:47:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

Yes, Ford is a very interesting man.
he was a pacifist who began to understand the role of the international Zionist bankers like the Rothschilds in causing and profiting from war- WWI in particular.
he spent much of his fortune trying to expose them in their true colors. they've taken over many of his legacy since and did their usual character assassination on anyone who worked against them.

Perhaps now his efforts will come to fruition now that more and more can see Zionist criminality in front of their very eyes.

2007-10-26 07:05:08 · answer #1 · answered by John M 4 · 1 0

False.

Most of us want "peace and personal prosperity". No matter what it costs us.

Interestingly Henry Ford became a rather wealthy man under the system.

2007-10-26 06:57:07 · answer #2 · answered by tantiemeg 6 · 0 1

True - I hope! I think the populace has been so dumbed down that they would be unable to comprehend it.

The fact that the federal reserve is a private banking cartel and eliminating the gold standard keeps us in debt.

2007-10-26 06:56:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Henry Ford became a multi billionaire under that system.

I disagree.

2007-10-26 06:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by wizjp 7 · 0 2

False.

As an honest American, I have to state that Americans, as a whole, are too lazy to do anything about anything, other than to change the batteries in the remote.

Sorry if this angers some, but ask yourself: What have you protested? What have you tried to change?

2007-10-26 06:57:37 · answer #5 · answered by tombollocks 6 · 3 0

both, what would happen is many would get out of the stock market, buy gold and silver and move to switzerland or put their assets off shore. many would sell off their homes, expensive cars etc, pay off their debts and use their money to buy real money (gold, silver, euros anyone?)

many would lose faith in the fiat currency, since faith in it is the only thing keeping it afloat, those who can will get out and the rest will suffer the most loss, become homeless, probably be forced into debtors prisons, or slave labor camps or be homeless living under a bridge or be used for target practice.

some will inevitably stop paying their taxes, hold up and form their armies as much as they can to fight the feds when they come to arrest them for not paying a tax they legally don't have to pay. the results would all be mixed, after all america is a mix bag of different types of people.

so it would be total chaos. ford was referring to the fact that banks lend money (fed reserve is private bank) made out of thin air and getting in return massive amounts of real profits (houses, property, gold silver oil etc). the real wealth builders are the workers and enterpeners, not the bankers, they make money with no risk, and i mean no risk. they make more money in one day doing nothing then you or I make working a lucratic job or digging ditches a whole year, or repairing cars, curing the sick, if I had to choose between a doctor or bankers I will take the doctor everytime, bankers are an unecessary institution. the bankers make money simply because a peice of papers says they own the right to print money, or paper that says they own a factory, or peice of property (and rent it out and get 10 times what it is worth sold outright). the owner of capital really has little value to society if that one actually does nothing personally to produce a good or service of real benefit to people.

if a owner of a business owns that business and actually gets real money(gold silver, property) from trade to have to invest, say into improving the business, or investing in another business, that money was earned. the ability to just print a peice of paper or putting a digit into a computer to make money, that is not legitimate earned profit for the bankers who does this. a banker in this capacity is unneeded, teh government was in it's perfect right to print money and determine it's value without any debt attached. when you think government think people, the whole of america, not government, as in corporation.

money is only a medium of exchange, nothing more nothing less, it was never meant to be a master and the people a slave, it really has no value except what we give it. a product of use has value, a property producing food has real value, a car has value (it gets you around) a house has value you can live in it, get warm in winter, sleep peacefully, (hopfully) paint it make it look really nice, plant a nice flower garden, or vegie garden, it has real value. it is a tangilble value, gold silver or fiat currency has no value except what people give it. your labor has value, it benefits the laborer and others too. nothing like having someone with a peice of paper trading it for real wealth (the house, farm, animal, clothing, business, etc) talk about a major scam I have ever seen.

gold and silver was only chosen as a medium of exchange due to rarity, ease of handling and molding and longevity. it is injust to make massive profits simply because you have control of the money that is made out of nothing, and control how much goes into the market and how much to charge people to have access to something that belongs to everyone in the first place (government had the right remember people are supposed to be the government) money is really an illusionary value, anything that someone else wants and you have is money, you can use an apple as money to trade for oranges if necessary. if I have grapes and you have potatoes we can agree on a fair trade ourselves without the bankers help. by the way some societies don't use money per say they trade, that way they avoid indebteness to anyone else, once the trade is over the transaction is complete, fiat currency doens't work that way all it is is transferring ious down the line. whenever a type of currency is forced on people and they can only use this type of currency (trading tool) then you have usury, fraud, abuses and robbery to those who control that currency and have a monoploy on producing it and loaning it out.

RRRRR

2007-10-26 08:13:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

disagree, if more knew about the banking and monetary system, we would all be thousands more rich

2007-10-26 07:05:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. Banks are out to steal our money with fees.

2007-10-26 06:59:06 · answer #8 · answered by Xiomy 6 · 0 1

T! Definitely! Wait, F! Yes, F! Without a doubt. Well, it might be T.....

2007-10-26 06:55:34 · answer #9 · answered by Ginger R 6 · 0 0

false as long as they have a cell phone something to eat they are very happy.

2007-10-26 06:51:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers