English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a long video, but absolutely terrifying. It's pretty scary how corrupt she is, but it's even scarier how much evidence there is against her, and how there are still no consequences.

Long story short, she took campaign money from Paul, the Clinton's used it for outside interestests and hid the money from the campaign finance books, then lied about having any knowledge Paul's contributions. There is video evidence of Hilary directly speaking with Paul about the contributions and a fundraising "Gala", and yet we have not even heard about this in the news, except for a couple of blurbs on Fox News. God help this country if that criminal is elected.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7007109937779036019

2007-10-26 06:36:38 · 22 answers · asked by Brad the Fox 3 in Politics & Government Politics

If you are going to dispute the video, you have to watch it first. It's a fourteen minute video, but libs are calling it bunk two minutes after I post the question.

Who needs information when you are a liberal?

2007-10-26 06:48:19 · update #1

22 answers

Hi Brad,
Not surprised are you? I posted this a couple of days ago myself, and the response was no different. I did my homework before posting. She has done something felonious. Both Stan Lee, the creator of "Spiderman," and Peter Paul were taken down by the Clintons. Defrauding a major contributor! Clearly it is noted on: http://www.worldnetdaily.com
Liberals do not feel they need to be enlightened unless it is something negative that may be brought up about Republicans and they don't usually get that right either.
Hillary is currently under investigation for campaign contributions.
Not to worry. The truth always comes out in the end. I hope the headlines are huge when it is proved she is corrupt.
I think there are too many who are unable to be fooled by the Clintons again.

2007-10-26 07:25:07 · answer #1 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 4 3

ABC News' Raelyn Johnson Reports: After an article in Friday's "Los Angeles Times" revealed that Clinton received large donations from poor residents living in New York City's Chinatown, the Edwards campaign pounced on the opportunity to bring more attention to the questionable contributions.
"This morning we all read in L.A. Times that many Clinton campaign contributions are raising eyebrows again. Many of their donors are not even registered to vote, and at least one denied even making any contribution at all," Edwards Campaign Manager David Bonior said in a statement on Friday.

2007-10-27 11:52:42 · answer #2 · answered by fraz 4 · 2 1

After the video.....and the responses from the radical left......
Can we all agree that if we had video-graphical proof of the Clintonites sacrificing a lamb at the alter of Liberalism....it would still not be enough proof to change the minds of the mindless.

But I hope this does not keep us all from trying to get the truth out.

PS. According to at least one poster....it was all a splice and dice fiction.....what a good job....I have never seen, you know, five minute segments spliced so seamlessly. It really look like one complete statement....(sarcasm for the benefit of the left)

2007-10-27 10:53:39 · answer #3 · answered by Lilliput1212 4 · 1 1

I showed the video to a Liberal here at work, and she called it a lie. You will never change their minds. I am a conservative who is very unhappy with the Republican party, and most Republicans are dissatisfied. I don't know a single Liberal who criticizes Liberals.

Elway's answer is exactly what I'm talking about. They will not question why the Clinton's were involved with this Felon, but rather why take a Felon's word?

2007-10-26 14:13:22 · answer #4 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 3 3

If she is the Dem candidate in the general election,then yes. She is not my favorite among the Dem's but she has to be better than anything the repubs are offering. I would love to see a woman in office-just not sure that I am sure that she is the best woman. She smacks a little bit too much of the same old s**t that we are seeing in office right now. However, she can not possibly be more corrupt than the group that is in there right now! I want some major change!

2007-10-26 13:52:32 · answer #5 · answered by Fencing and Kung Fu mom 2 · 5 3

Corrupt?? Try generations of republicans..scum, greedy oil drenched maggots

2007-10-28 15:26:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'm glad Mr. Paul caught this liar on tape.
If she is elected we'll have to change the name we give to our leader from President, to Prime Minister. Hellary is a Socialist.

2007-10-26 14:44:31 · answer #7 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2 3

Please. I've seen the video. What a bunch of pasted together hooey. Yeah, Peter Paul is real credible. Let's take a repeat felon's word for it - he's against Hillary so that makes it okay.

Peter Paul:

*Guilty of conspiracy to defraud the Cuban government to the tune of $8.75 million.

*Guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.

*Guilty of federal charges for making false statements to customs inspectors and traveling under a false identity.

*Served eight years in federal prison, then broke parole for the false statement rap and went back to prison for two more years.

EDIT: You are hardly the first person to present this video to try and slam Hillary, so don't assume all the "liberals" haven't seen it. I watched the entire thing. God, you guys will believe anything from anyone, even a repeat felon, as long as it includes a slam against Hillary Clinton. Simply pathetic.

2007-10-26 13:49:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 7

I certainly won't vote for her, but if she is elected, I will give her the respect due to the office of the President.

2007-10-26 13:42:56 · answer #9 · answered by Leah 6 · 6 3

If she is elected I will give her the same respect the liberals on Y/A gave George Bush.

2007-10-26 13:47:20 · answer #10 · answered by hdean45 6 · 6 5

fedest.com, questions and answers