Why Do People Support A Criminal US President (Revisited)?

Question

1. Why do people support a criminal US President?

a. Which law has he broken?

Bush Senior violated the Constitution as he needs the approval of Congress to make war. This he never got! What he did get was the approval for funding. His administration lied to Congress and to the American people about Iraq...about war deaths, the nature of Iraq's leadership, and the possibility of imminent danger.

Then when their negotiator secured Saddam's agreement to withdraw, they screwed the negotiator by silencing what he had done. They said that Saddam refused to withdraw which was not the case. So, the negotiator gets to know the Iraqi regime and can and will testify before a joint session of Congress as to events and observations, and Bush administration wrongdoings!

In Bush Junior's term he was advised by US intelligence and by our firm as to everything that went on during his father's term in office, yet he continued to believe the Cheney version and the lies that came from

to be contd

unreliable CIA operatives in and from Kuwait and Iraq.

The Bush administration and the one's that preceded him, have a reputation for lying and bad political dealings.

In an effort to get Saddam, people in his administration lied about the Iraq War to the American people and to the entire world.

Bush administration lies were perpetuated at the UN by Secretary of State Colin Powell in an effort to secure UN Resolutions. Doing so is fraudulent.

What laws did he violate? US laws on the duties of his office, lies to the people, and lies to the UN. It is illegal for our nation to go to war without the consent of Congress.

Fraud and lies committed by the Bush Junior administration and violations of US and UN laws are violations!

These things resulted in the deaths of 1.8 million innocent Iraqis today and a few of you dumb people keep saying and asking, "What laws did he violate?"

When a US President is intentionally negligent in the carriage of his duties and murder takes

.

you people look pretty dumb saying, "What crime did the President violate?"

He and his administration violated the US constitution, lied about the Iraq War, and subsequently, thereby, murdered 1.8 million people. Is murder ever a crime?

Can you explain all of the illegal activity and cover ups and why do people get dunned, by the President, if no wrongdoing occurred?

There is not enough room to answer everyone in this short forum, but you should never call names or use slander words. By being anonymous, some of you feel you can say anything with impunity. Why not publish who you are. Afraid?

billyboy64, you and another poster by the name of Jim, I believe, made a good point, but the thing that these unprofessional questions are asking hopes that an indictment comes down. The Bush administration crimes and the Iraq War will never be remedied by impeachment!

citizenvnfla:

"If this is true, then why have our Democrat leaders let this golden opportunity pass them by?"

peacenegotiator:

Good question! You are thinking logically. The above is true, Bush and his administration did violate US and international laws and are war criminals responsible for the deaths of many Iraqis. It doesn't matter what Saddam did or is as it doesn't pertain to thew question of the Bush administration's violation of the laws. The result of violating the law or laws is a the deaths of an estimated 1.8 million Iraqis. This is a very great and serious crime. Why hasn't congress taken action and on no WMD and fraudulent statements made at congressional hearings and at the UN I can not say. But the truth of the matter still stands.

Based on the gravity of this illegal war, the right thing to do is to stand up and call for both impeachment and the indictment of all parties to this crime.

I did get the chance to directly speak to Kucinich and

Obama and they seemed too scared to tackle this problem.

LAST THING FOR THIS THREAD.

I didn't want to make this thread long and it is a waste of time trying to communicate with you people. If you don't like what I post, then DON'T read it!

.

Answer 1

Come on, charge him...when he is convicted of a crime I will support that, until then he is innocent until proven guilty. I see no due process in the lip service of Bush Lied.

Answer 2

You are totally off the wall with your complaints. The left wing loonies in Congress have been trying for years to come up with a reason to impeach Mr. Bush. He has not committed any high crimes or misdemeanors (as required by the Constitution) so there are no grounds for impeachment. Read it in the Constitution.
Congress has the responsibility to "declare" war and fund war. It is the responsibility of the President to wage war if he thinks it necessary. 535 politicians cannot possibly get together to determine when and how to fight a war. Read the Constitution.
There were no lies. The left wing liberal loonies in Congress and in the main stream media have had six years to look for lies. They found none.

Your English grammar is less than perfect, so I cannot even comment on your last two paragraphs.

Please don't consider continuing your nonsensical diatribe. This forum is supposed to be for people asking legitimate questions.

Answer 3

President of the United States of America George W. Bush is not a Criminal. He is a Strong Christian Man who has faith in God and he relies on his faith to get through life. Also, President Bush considers Jesus Christ as the Greatest Philosopher in history.

Answer 4

Wow. So many Bush backers I just had to put my two cents in. I think I'd be safe in saying that there is much more evidence of criminal behavior against G.W. Bush than against any of the detainees in Guantanamo. The difference? Bush has backing and position. Stalin sent millions of his own people to die in Siberia at his personal discretion. How many years did he spend in prison for it? Lack of official criminal charges against G.W. in no way implies his innocence any more than a lack of official charges against "terrorist" detainees implies their guilt.

Answer 5

The Democrats control the U.S. House of Representative, who has sole power of impeachment. If what you say is true, why have they not impeached him yet? All it takes is a simple majority. Then he will stand trial in the Senate, where it takes a super-majority (2/3) to remove him from office.

Answer 6

If this is true, then why have your commucrat leaders let this golden opportunity pass them by?

Are they more "STUPID" than you commies claim GWB is?

Come on commy why? You communist minded freaks have been after him since he kicked you internet inventing X vice president's a** in 2000. You don't have a thing on him do you? Do you? If you do then belly up to the bar and serve it up. Else, climb back into your Castro cigar throw open up Stalin's Bio and wait for Fred and his admin to rule for the next 8 years.

Answer 7

Apparently you don't understand the way the government works...The President does not need congressional approval to commit forces...you can continue to "revisit" this issue as much as you feel the need to, but I would suggest that if Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi don't have a reason to impeach Bush, you're not going to come up with one either.

Answer 8

As the same in this question, I don't see the a violation that constitutes a war crime. Keep trying. EDIT: I am still waiting for you to substantiate a crime.

Answer 9

Criminal minds make excellent politicians. Read "The Prince" by Machiavelli for details on the Bush administration.

Answer 10

Hillary isn't a president and she never will be.