I am in a league in which two owners are playing this week who are both badly affected by bye weeks. Each team has good tight ends who are both on byes. Would it be collusion or otherwise unfair play for both teams to publicly agree to not start tight ends this week in their matchup?
The agreement would be public and would equally affect both teams. These indicate that it might not be collusive per se since the agreement is not secret nor does it unfairly benefit one team at the expense of the other. Also, both teams would suffer from lack of total points that week, which would hurt them in the overall standings via the tiebreaking system.
On the other hand, neither team would have to drop a player they might want to retain to aquire a marginal tight end who they'd inevitably drop the following week, and this might be a mutually unfair advantage gained by the agreement.
Is this agreement fair? Collusive?
I'm inclined to think it's not collusive but may be unfair.
2007-10-26
03:25:19
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Master P
2
in
Sports
➔ Fantasy Sports