2007-10-26 00:23:30 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Most people in situations of shock, panic, grief & utter chaos are not reliable.
Am sure you, yourself, wouldn't be much help is a similar situation, God forbid. And you'd want to help, you would. You'd also do your utmost & strain your brain to remember every single detail of that night even at the cost of being called a fruitcake.
2007-10-26 00:34:16 · answer #1 · answered by Faith 6 · 3⤊ 9⤋
Absolutely not! I agree with Stormy on this one. The changing stories, that is a pretty good indication when someone is lying. Also, why would she say that the man was definitely carrying Maddie? So, let me get this straight. She sees a strange man carrying her friend's daughter away and she just shrugs it off and goes back to dinner. That is a lie, plain and simple. If I had seen a stranger carrying my friend's child off, I would have chased the guy down and probably beat him to a bloody pulp!! If Ms. Tanner is trying to help the McCanns get away with something, she would be better off keeping her mouth shut, she is not doing them an ounce of good.
2007-10-26 02:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by Momma_of_3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As Faith rightly pointed out it's not easy re creating a picture of an event in your mind, especially when what you are seeing has no significance at the time.so for that fact alone her evidence cannot be 100% reliable. She didn't see the face of the child or of course she would have recognised her.
I think you are all being too harsh on Jane Tanner...she is in an impossible situation, and not one of you in the same situation would have produced anything different than she has.
Can you remember the faces of EVERY stranger you passed in the street yesterday?
2007-10-26 01:32:45 · answer #3 · answered by nusha 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You are asking the wrong people. No-one here is in a position to judge that.
It might fit my general view of this case (that the McCanns cannot be condemned on the basis of the "evidence" so far in the public domain) to think that she is reliable but I can no more say that than any of the McCann haters can say that she is not simply because it suits their prejudices that it should be so.
2007-10-26 02:06:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. The McCann gang must get together and plan what the next step will be to take the heat off of pals Kate and Gerry.All she is doing is turning more of the public against them .
2007-10-26 00:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by Lesley P 1 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think its obvious that she's completely unreliable. Her statement and her description of the "abductor" has changed too many times to be credible.
2007-10-26 01:16:24 · answer #6 · answered by Ysanne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She plays quite well at centre back, however the last few weeks she has been caught out of position.
She probably just needs a run in the side to build her confidence up.
2007-10-26 00:29:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yeh.. about as reliable as English Football !
2007-10-26 00:30:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No she has been proved to be a liar by changing her story so many times.
2007-10-26 00:42:27 · answer #9 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't see her evidence as credible, as it changed from a blanket to bundle to child then lo and behold to Madeleine!
If she really saw the image in that new artists impression then she should have recognised her best friends daughter.
2007-10-26 00:27:44 · answer #10 · answered by !Lady Stormy! 5 · 14⤊ 1⤋
Swinging? yeah
2007-10-26 01:56:34 · answer #11 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋