Some woman living somewhere in Mongolia.. but she shuts up about it so no-one knows.
2007-10-25 23:28:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bloed 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
jointly as intelligence is a difficult component to quantify, i does not placed the two of those 2 human beings on the extraordinary of my record for numerous motives. a million) Neither has finished any extreme floor breaking paintings. 2) the two have bought out and might particularly write relatively undesirable prevalent technological expertise books approximately pretend technological expertise than do actual technological expertise or attempt and prepare actual technological expertise. we want human beings like Carl Sagan to coach us approximately actual theories and recommendations in present day technological expertise, no longer this hogwash those 2 adult adult males are continuously talking approximately like multiverse theory and parallel worlds and whatnot. 3) Many many human beings have contributed lots greater to technological expertise in a greater common way by using hours of long difficult paintings and function made extensive breakthroughs. Given all of that, i might placed Edward Witten at or close to the extraordinary of my maximum clever record of folk. in case you don't be conscious of him, he's a professor at Caltech among different places. His credentials: a million) He has been provided a Fields Medal. it is in certainty a Nobel Prize, yet for arithmetic. and what's much greater staggering is that he's the 1st and easily Physicist to obtain that medal (which by utilising the way is barely given out each 4 years) 2) He unmarried-handedly stunned the international by utilising combing 5 separate string theories into one theory, specifically M-theory. 3) He has the optimal h-index of any dwelling scientists (an h-index measures the productiveness and magnitude of a scientists study by utilising protecting music of what number cases his papers are referenced). in certainty the better the h-index, the greater paintings a scientists has finished and the greater considerable it relatively is. (Stephen Hawking's h-index is barely 62 and Michio Kaku is a measly 22) there is greater to being a competent and clever scientist that writing numerous undesirable books and generating very deceptive television documentaries.
2016-10-14 02:21:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harry Potter
2007-10-26 09:37:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Abdul Kalam is very intelligent person on earth.
2007-10-25 23:42:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Galloway!
2007-10-25 23:27:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hawking is a good possibility. Definitely NOT Al Gore.
2007-10-25 23:27:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
living?
probably Steven Hawking.
2007-10-25 23:23:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by hadarp2 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
One who scored nobel prize in physics
dr. Sanger who illustrated the structure of insulin and other nanomolecules.
Also may be any body of bohr family
2007-10-25 23:46:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
THIS IS A DIFFICULT QUESTION TO ANSWER BUT AS SOMEONE HAS ALREADY ANSWERED, AS FAR AS WE KNOW IT IS PROBABLY STEVEN HAWKING.
2007-10-26 03:29:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Loren S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think i's Chuck norris...
He is everything you can imagine....
PS.: I am Chuck Norris...
2007-10-25 23:27:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋