The LEM was attached to the front of the Apollo capsule.
It disconnected and landed ont he moon, then the legs/lower portion acted like a platform to allow the module to blast off and reconnect with Apollo. The unti was abandoned and Apollo returned to earth
2007-10-25 16:59:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Experto Credo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its been proven time and time agin, we did land on the Moon. May I also remind you that there was 6 Moon Missions that landed on the lunar surface during the Apollo era. None of these Apollo Moon Landing's were hoaxed. I will discuss and disprove the conspiracy theories you may be familiar with. Think about it logically; The spacecrafts were definitely launched by NASA, which is difficult to fake. Second the Apollo crafts could NOT have orbited the Earth for 8 days as some of the conspiracy theorists have claimed. If NASA had of done that they would have been caught on their lie, especially if they did it six times. The Russians tracked the Apollo missions very closely and they knew for a fact that none of the missions were faked. If they only had the slightest clue that the Moon Landing was faked it would have been the ultimate propaganda weapon for use against the US and to Capitalism. The flag waves because it was planted in the soil and Armstrong twisted the poles. This is obvious because in other footage you can see the flag is not moving when he walks past it. Also the reason there is no blast crater beneath Apollo 11 is because when the craft landed it reduced speed upon landing on the Moon's surface, so all that it did was blow away dust. The same is with driving into a car park because you don't drive in at 30 miles an hour. Over 3 quarters of a million people were working on the project in total. It would have been impossible for every 1 of them to keep a secret. Even filming the landing would have been MORE DIFFICULT than landing on the Moon itself. Think about the number of people they would have needed to shoot the Moon landing in a film studio. Lastly if the Moon Landing was faked, we would have found out years ago. These things don't last 41 years without an answer.
2016-04-10 06:16:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Lunar Excursion Module had a base attached to it for landing. In turn, it was used as a launch platform for the Lunar Excursion Module, which unlatched (with explosives)from the base to return to dock with the Command Module using its small rocket engine and then returned to Earth using the rocket power of the Command Module. The LEM was discarded of before heading back to Earth.
2007-10-25 17:05:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kevin U 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is it you want Mary? You want the moon? I'll just throw a lasso around it and pull it on down for ya? Does that answer your question, George ******** Bailey?
2007-10-25 16:57:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Craig F. 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think this question would be more intriguing if I could actually understand what was being asked?
2007-10-25 16:57:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
with great difficulty.
Maybe you should research your topic a little (at least wikipeia it) before you ask silly questions.
2007-10-25 16:57:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by deltaqdelta 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they drove a moonbuggy - it looked kind like one of those Volkswagon dunebuggys.
2007-10-25 16:58:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know? But it was thier lucky.
2007-10-25 16:58:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hasa 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea carefully.
2007-10-25 16:56:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
carefully
2007-10-25 16:55:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by bugsie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋