http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/20767.html
On the basis of spending, he is, just as he is in terms of foreign policy.
2007-10-25 16:49:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He's 10, no 100 times worse. At least LBJ possessed some degree of humility. After he had gotten us into the quagmire of Vietnam, for which I think he was genuinely sorry for, he decided not to run for a 2nd term. Very, very rare in this country's history.
It's purported that he once said, "If we win this war - the Vietnam war - I will go down in history as a great president. If not, I'll just simply be a "footnote".
When Bush was elected, Clinton had left a surplus in the national treasury: an almost unheard of event.
Since Bush took over, the national debt as soared to an unprecedented height; the last time I looked it was somewhere between 8-9 TRILLlON dollars.
I'm going to terminate my response. Becoming to angry.
An angry,
Wotan
2007-10-25 17:06:38 · answer #1 · answered by Alberich 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
LBJ agonized over the war and it ruin his spirit as well as his health , while Bush with his own words says he sleep just fine at night
2007-10-26 00:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by jean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have never had as corrupt a president as W. He will go down in history for that and his utter incompetence. LBJ was a star compared to him.
2007-10-26 00:51:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is more Mussolini than LBJ.
2007-10-26 00:01:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush is more FDR than LBJ.
2007-10-25 23:55:28 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Why do Libs hate him so much?!?!
2007-10-26 00:03:12 · answer #6 · answered by rachek 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋