Does it make sense for logging company's to regrow trees after cutting them down?

Answer 1

My boyfriend is a logger, and he said that they don't cut down all the trees in the areas they do. They leave some (quite a few) standing, and before you know it there are tons of trees in that area again!!! Support our loggers by asking for paper bags at the grocery store!!! :)

Answer 2

Yes, if they didn't, they couldn't stay in business. It is national parks, which can't afford to replant trees after they die or are burned down who is destroying forest, not logging companies who have an incentive to replant and conserve.

Answer 3

If they don't plant new trees, then they won't have more to cut down in the future.
And there won't be trees to protect the wildlife, the soil, the moisture in the air, the oxygen we breathe.
Sounds like good reasons to plant new trees, don't you think?

Answer 4

Sure. Wood/lumber/logs are renewable resources, and to keep it renewable, there needs to be new trees.

Actually, it makes more sence to selectively cut trees, letting trees reproduce amongst themselves insted of clear cutting and replanting... but you know logistics...

Answer 5

Sure.

"Tree farms" can grow more lumber, and reduce the need to cut down natural forests.

Answer 6

i'm afraid that "premaculture" is stable. Depeding on the rustic, a logging corporation could be required to plant timber. the issue is that whether they do plant the timber(rather unlikely in many places by way of loss of conservative source administration) they're planting timber which would be helpful to them sooner or later so as that they are able to come again back and shrink them down in yet another forty years. yet another issue is that in many cases in rainforests, the floor is depleted of foodstuff as quickly as decrease by way of the two erosion of soil(they get alot of rain) or in the certainty that numerous the biomes foodstuff are locked in the biomass. The biomass is the timber they decrease and despatched foreign places. additionally, rainforest dynamics are slightly diverse in different tactics. organic woodland develops in ranges of succession and planting monoculture timber unbalances this organic order and consequently the woodland, if left on my own(unlikely), will take over one hundred years to be triumphant in its organic state. you may desire to undergo in suggestions that the international places the place extra rainforests lie are very undesirable or somewhat undesirable and consequently are extra inquisitive approximately feeding their families than replantation. So it does not ask your self me in any respect to make certain a woodland cleared and left to erode. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that cynical it sounds, it is the certainty.

Answer 7

yes the preservation of forest lands was started by Theodore Roosevelt and hence we still have trees .

Answer 8

And to prevent soil erosion.

Answer 9

I don't know but that is a pretty good question