How about a strike on their nuclear facilities?
2007-10-25 14:58:26 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well actually the nuclear treaty Bush signed with Russia in 2003.
Calls for both the US and Russia, to dismantle most nuclear warheads down to a level of 2,200 warheads each.
Makes ya wonder why the last president, couldn't have signed a treaty reducing nuclear warheads.
But I guess since only a Democrat has ever used nuclear warheads before, the democratic party, like having a bunch of nukes around.
2007-10-25 15:14:43 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Now this is just silly. The objective of the sanctions is to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Once they have them sanctions would probably only provoke their use. Usually your questions are thoughtful, this one seems to be an effort to be clever and missed the target. Sorry.
2007-10-26 00:51:57 · answer #2 · answered by Matt W 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Speak quietly CHI Putin is just waking up. He's already playing war games over NO. America (we are too...) selling subs to CHavez ( I love Sharia he posts the best stuff). Having checked he is also looking at whacking Norway & her pipeline that gives Europe some help vs these nut case leaders. Try Finland that has a nice long border full of land mines. They had a treaty to remove them and have been considering breaking it because Putin is destroying years of Democracy in Russia. Add the Hitler youth he allows to raid and attack immigrants...
Putin is behind the underground Nuclear facilities in Iran. I read all the papers over there. US news takes so long to report details. If ever. Like Bush at the last Press Conference. Look toward the Trans Caspian Sea Oil Pipeline for some answers why Iran & Russia want to talk nice. Iran owes a few bil for construction of the Nuc's and stopped them until a payoff. Sanctions do not help as his scientists are running for the hills.
NO not yet. Sleep well my friend. Until we meet again. Kim
2007-10-25 22:18:25 · answer #3 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think in the little Bush world of 'my weiner is bigger' he's afraid that Vlad will have the bigger one. But then again, we are talking Bush here.
2007-10-26 13:25:01 · answer #4 · answered by momatad 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, even Russia is more rational than Iran.
Ah, is someone upset that sanctions are being put on their hero?
2007-10-25 22:07:28 · answer #5 · answered by pgb 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If their weapons were regularly being used to kill Americans as Iran's are - then yes!! When are the lib's going to wake up and see that Iran has been at war with the US since the 1970's US embassy take over by Iran?
2007-10-25 22:02:20 · answer #6 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Russia would kick the US's asss the state they are in right now. Russia are just waiting for the US to go into a third war with Iran and then they will strike the US. World war 3 is pretty much inevitable now. A lot of Americans truly believe that they are invincible. lol. They will learn one day.
2007-10-25 22:07:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 8⤋
Please. Let's focus on changing things we CAN control, rather than just angst against things we can't until the next election.
2007-10-26 10:36:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Russia has not made threats to incinerate another Country.
2007-10-25 22:01:25 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
When was the last time the Russian government stated it wanted to genocide another country?
OK then.. but thanks for playing.
2007-10-25 22:30:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋