False News enjoys showing every positive wrinkle. They also decided that nothing could be garnered by reporting the litany of terrorist explosions. Paris Hilton was more important than people dying.
2007-10-25 14:26:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
6⤊
14⤋
It's interesting, isn't it? When the war was going badly, it was "All war, all the time." Now that the effort is working and working incredibly well, not a peep. You wouldn't even know there was a war the way the media's not covering it. And notice too that the democrats in congress have been amazingly quiet after their embarrassing behavior in September and progress being made. Maybe they're gathered somewhere in a meeting room, facing east and praying to Allah that America will still lose and bring their party glory in the loss.
You also know that the surge is working because Yahoo 'progressives' are getting more vicious than ever. Some might call that desperation, but certainly they couldn't possibly be hoping for America to fail in it's attempts to bring freedom and democracy to an oppressed people.
2007-10-25 14:49:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
The Main Stream Left-wing News Media doesn't
want the democrats to lose the next election so
they will only report the negative aspect of the
US Military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the
rest of the Middle East!! They want the USA to lose, that was the way it was during the Vietnam War, because I spent 3 tours there in 1967 - 1968
and 1971!!
2007-10-26 03:14:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
News agencies don't have the budget to send talking heads to places where there is no strife or despair.
Look at it this way. By definition, what is news is what is unusual. Negative is unusual so that's where their assets go.
I knew things were getting better there as soon as the number of embedded reporters dropped.
Then when the majors were just regurgitating what AP and Reuters were feeding them, that was it for me. It's almost over.
Now the occaisional human interest story will come across. Some sensational story about some a who fell and broke his arm because of Bush's hegemony or man bites dog crap.
2007-10-25 14:42:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
people are so numbed by the negative events. that when something positive happens, they don't know how to respond. Plus the main stream media plays it down . There is this thing called freedom of the press, it's more like restricted honesty.The media has always been bias to the left.anything positive to report is bad news to the left. As it would impede their quest of consolidation of power over the masses.
2007-10-25 15:10:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by a person of interest 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Because the Liberal Socialist Democrats have bet their Jobs on the Failure of the Bush Administration to Win the War against the Islamic Terrorists.
Their only hope is:
1. To ATTACK BUSH INSTEAD OF THE TERRORISTS.
2. Find or Fabricate anti War Stories that will help them to
demoralize Our Brave AMERICAN MILITARY AT WAR!
3. To utilize their Control of the Liberal Controlled Media, to
Hide any and ALL Positive Results of the Surge, and of
the Advances made by the Military and the Bush
Administration.
They Especially HIDE THE STORIES of AMERICAN
MILITARY HEROES WHO HAVE DEMONSTRATED
THEIR HEROIC DEEDS, WHICH HAVE WON THEM
HONORS including the CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF
HONOR.
The Liberal (Soros Owned) Democrats and Media are willing to cost US to Loose the War, and suffer American Military DEATHS, just to WIN THE UPCOMING ELECTIONS, AND TO RETAIN THEIR POWER!
2007-10-25 14:48:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sentinel 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
B/C they have their own agenda. The media (abc, cbs,nbc,cnn, etc) will never report anything positive about the surge. They only report on what they choose to report on, for a reason !
2007-10-25 14:54:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Because the media is too cowardly to tell the truth when it does not serve the interest of the liberal nutjobs like moveon.org. Remember that the motto of most news organization is "If it bleeds, it leads". Well, in their little pinheads, no blood, no news. The main stream media WANTS us to lose this war. They WANT the enemy to win. Then they can say "see, we were right".
2007-10-25 15:39:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by largecar8 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because the media to me is a bunch of bull shiters who only want to bring down our president and focus of the negative. My cousin was over in Iraq and told me all the good that is happening over there. But do we hear about it? No and that's not fair to our troops or our country as a whole.
2007-10-25 14:51:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
With the exception of Fox News, the other liberal media outlets don't show the positive because as with any media outlet, there is a political agenda. The media does not place any value on showing the positive things that are happening over there. The media likes to jump on the band wagon about how the rich don't have to die in this war. I personally know several multi-millionaires who have re-enlisted and volunteered to be shipped to Iraq. One in particular re-enlisted back into the Navy Seals and deployed with Seal Team One.
2007-10-25 14:30:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by big_dreamer2005 2
·
10⤊
4⤋
Uh, you mean like dozens murdered by the last attack on a residential area?
The millions homeless?
The million people murdered? The thousands rotured and raped?
What positives?
How women used to be able to work and shop and generally leave their houses, but can't now?
How parents are afraid that, if they let their kid go to school, they'll never see them again?
Are those the positives?
2007-10-25 19:11:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
1⤊
2⤋