English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Everyone left in an orderly manner. No one rioted or looted like they did in New Orleans. No one is whining about the government. People had less time to leave in SD and yet it isn't everyone else's fault. And yet, the New Orlean's slobs are STILL bitching.

2007-10-25 14:21:09 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

4 answers

Many in New Orleans were "looting" for essential supplies like food and water b/c there were none. That was not the case in San Diego at all. These disaster is not on the same scale as katrina by any means and it is ridiculous and unfair to make any comparisons. Most of the city of SD was functioning completely normally and the fires were nowhere near the urban parts of San Diego, the part of SD I live in was functioning normally and actually more people were out partying b/c they had work or school off. It's too bad people like you are too ignorant and small minded to realize the stark differences between the two disasters.

edit
reply to Nigganator:

"Uh, no, the vast majority of looting was cases of people going into stores and taking non-essential supplies. There is countless footage of dark-skinned beasts running out of stores with jewelry, televisions, game consoles, and etc."

Wow you are an idiot!! You believe everything you see on tv? There were also people looting for food and water on TV but I guess you chose to ignore that.

"Over a million people are displaced by the SD wildfires. You're an idiot."

You have no clue what the hell you are talking about you moron!! A million people were not evacuated, only about 1/2 that were TOLD to evacuate and many did not. There were no traffic jams and plenty of hotel vacancies during the fires. You are such an idiot and dont know what the hell you are talking about. I live in SAn Diego and I know for a fact nothing close to a million people were affected by the fires and the devastation is nothing compared to Katrina.


I feel sorry for people like you. You are so damn stupid and ignorant and I seriously hope you never reproduce. You hide behind some little anonymous online screename b/c you are too much of a p*ssy to say this non sense in public. YOu are really pathetic and have absolutely no clue what the hell you are talking about. Get a life and an education you moron!

2007-10-26 06:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by Sav 6 · 0 0

This is an example of "A Question That Is Not Supposed To Be Asked". Similar to how you are not supposed to ask when prominent DNA studies reveal that all people are _not_ exactly equal at the gene-pool level.

The only reason things are different at Qualcomm Center in San Diego is because the people there are able to get massages. That is the only difference. It has nothing to do with ethnicity, poverty, average education levels, or the sorts of people who fall into the lower rungs of those categories. It is ALL ABOUT THE MASSAGES!!!!

2007-10-25 18:09:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The CA wildfires effected mostly whites and Spanish. Just watch the footage on TV:

Because white and Spanish speaking americans know how to behave during an emergency and act like humans.

The blacks just use a situation like New Orleans to loot, kill, steal, and chimpout. It's embarrasing blacks are still asking for free handouts over Katrina 3 years after the fact.

2007-10-25 17:46:05 · answer #3 · answered by rosewrr 1 · 0 1

That's because this time there was a plan. there was a place for people to go. There was food and water. there were evacuation plans. there were places for people to take their pets. It was orderly and planned. There were people to help. The government was involved.

None of that happened in New Orleans.

I'll bet that financial aid arrives much quicker too.

2007-10-25 14:27:34 · answer #4 · answered by Dan H 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers