2007-10-25 13:48:55 · 5 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
g (below) Agreed. They did not commit premeditated murder. Yet they did beat that kid to death in an attempt to exert their authority. Man Slaughter is a just charge for what they did.
2007-10-25 13:57:09 · update #1
It is a travesty.
Especially when there is film of what they did. That jury has a lot of explaining to do.
At least the federal government has gotten involved.
And the NURSE. What was she there for if not to protect the health of the teens?
2007-10-25 13:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, they should be held accountable. Something you and I agree on.
2007-10-25 14:04:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't, that was rediculous and I think they should have gotten at least some sort of minor chrges...
I'm not saying they should get life or anything... but I think their neglegence lead to his death... I think that's manslaughter...
2007-10-25 13:53:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course they and that nurse should be held accountable. There was no reason to kick him and kill him and nobody held accountable.
2007-10-25 13:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
were they blackwater agents?
2007-10-25 13:52:20 · answer #5 · answered by ben j 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋