Why don't the liberal news agencies run this story? Why is this not on the front page of the NY Times? Why isn't this the lead story on all the news channels?
2007-10-25 13:26:37 · 16 answers · asked by elmar66 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Specifically the Anbar province.....
2007-10-25 13:31:30 · update #1
Success in Iraq is not on the **political** agenda of the MSM. They want and hope for bad news out of Iraq just like their allies the Democrats and Liberals do. They want us defeated on the battlefield. They want Americans to die so they can argue their "humanist" agenda. They are pathetic belly-crawlers of the America is always Wrong crowd.
2007-10-25 13:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most news agencies do not provide budgets to send talking heads to places were there is no death and destruction.
When the war is over, the publishers will not have money to advance writer/veterans that will tell a positive story.
The mission is to keep the viewing/reading/internet surfing public as depressed as possible until the US is merged into the EU.
2007-10-25 13:32:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What? No American deaths in Iraq last week...? That is incorrect. I assume you are talking about the week of the 14th through the 21st? There were 9 in Iraq... And since then there were 2 in Bahrian and two more in Iraq today. Get your facts straight...
2007-10-25 14:01:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
you need to comprehend how authorities works. it really is not as simplistic as you imagine. even as Obama took place of work they did not assume a monetary fallout and ensuing bankruptcies and the homestead mortage scandals. His advisors theory it should be 8 p.c. in accordance with present day info straightforward yet so what if he did not predict precisely the jobless cost. It does no longer matter what he predicted. bypass on. each and every of the monetary unlawful deals were no longer revealed even as he took place of work and no man or woman knew the economy ought to finally end up so undesirable, except those those who led to it. The stimulus change into restricted to shovel-waiting jobs meaning highway structure and it coated instructors and firefighters and police. Economists stated it change into no longer large sufficient. they have not spent all of it yet. there is not any speedy fix for what has befell. you would possibly want to be grateful Obama signed both unemployment extensions adverse to Republican competition. Obama has exceeded distinct classes to assist human beings. you need to ascertain the fix Act internet website. contained in the previous the inventory market index change into in preserving with the final monetary alerts yet that did not ensue. the great aspect about the market is peoples retirement debts have recovered countless the losses from 2008 and that is significant if human beings go with to take early retirement and the money is going into the economy.
2016-10-23 00:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no liberal media.
Most major media in America gets about 90% of news from Associated Press.
The NY Times gets about 24%
How do you explain that?
Right, you can't.
Besides, you're wrong. There were American deaths last week.
But how would you know? You don't read anything.
2007-10-25 13:43:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No deaths in a week? You mean to tell me we were having deaths every week? I thought they just reported a lump sum for the month... you know like one or two major battles were we lost hundreds. We have weekly deaths? We've been in Iraq since when?
2007-10-25 13:33:03 · answer #6 · answered by subprimelendor 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And how many civilian deaths where there?
No American deaths this week. Well then, 1 week out of the 208 so far. Those are good numbers.
2007-10-25 13:29:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thats not saying much considering that Bush joined sides with our enemy of 6 years giving them cash and weapons! Why hasnt the news asked where all the cash that just vanished has ended up? 12 Billion $s ...POOF ! its Gone, Seems to me that Bush has resorted to paying the enemy to leave!
2007-10-25 14:03:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
California fires are more immediate.
So I guess Americans who die in Iraq should just do it quietly and not bother the rest of us?
2007-10-25 13:29:44 · answer #9 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whats to be said? No one died this week... thats good.
.
.
.
Um... Yay?
.
.
.
.
Not much of a story as you can tell. It fantastic that no one is dead, but it does not mean that things are getting better in Iraq... Even Faux news is wise enough to see that.
2007-10-25 13:32:25 · answer #10 · answered by Wise_Guy_57 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋