35 just seems so young to be the comander in cheif......
2007-10-25 12:55:58 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We should make it 80 then they can only serve one term.
2007-10-25 13:01:27 · answer #1 · answered by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one born between 1946 and 1966 should be allowed to hold the office of President, ever. (Think about it, that'd've excluded both Slick Willy and Dubya - how could that be a bad thing?).
Yeah, that'd mean I couldn't run, but I'd never want the job, anyway.
2007-10-25 13:03:40 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. Honestly, if you're not mature enough to be president at 35, you're not going to be mature enough by age 40. There comes a point of "diminishing returns" with maturity. If you don't achieve it by a certain age, you're never going to achieve it.
2007-10-25 13:03:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The best canidate can be 37, so no. Some politicians have gifts in leadership, regardless of age.
2007-10-25 13:00:10 · answer #4 · answered by Mitchell 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋