English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anybody know why indentured servitude failed as a labor system? (Within the context of colonial American society.)

Thanks

2007-10-25 10:47:35 · 7 answers · asked by illbedamned 1 in Arts & Humanities History

7 answers

Conditions in Europe improved after 1650, reducing the supply of indentured servants, while at the same time increased competition in the slave trade was lowering the price of slaves. Over time a marked regional division emerged in colonial America. The use of slaves was concentrated in the South and European indentured servants concentrated in the Middle Colonies, where servants could expect to find the greatest opportunities to enter agriculture once they had completed their term of service. New England climate and soil were not conducive to the expansion of commercial agriculture, so it attracted relatively few slaves, indentured servants, or free immigrants. .

2007-10-25 16:33:40 · answer #1 · answered by meg 7 · 1 1

Indentured Servant System

2016-10-21 09:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

since they signed a contract to work for a set amount of time once the time was up plantation owners had to bring in new servants and the old servants had to go somewhere. They started to demand land and wanted to expand west but the wealthy owners didn't want to risk war with the Indians. They started to replace them with slaves.

2007-10-25 10:57:14 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny 2 · 1 0

Neither. Adotion is unlike indentured servitude simply by fact as you're saying there isn't any hard paintings element. as properly, adoptees do no longer and shouldn't might desire to experience like they are working for their adoptive mothers and dads to pay off a debt. Adoptees don't have a debt to pay to the adoptive mothers and dads. And, the adoptive mothers and dads that i be conscious of do no longer make their babies experience like they might desire to pay off a debt. neither is adoption like an arranged marriage wherein 2 households settle on with whom their babies would be "continuously" bonded to. With an arranged marriage the famlies, for the main area, be conscious of one yet another. they have some form of relationship which will proceed for the period of the path of the association. I liken aoption to one among a parent-newborn relationship. in basic terms like a organic and organic newborn, the adoptee, in maximum circumstances, are not getting to %. their parent. they have no decision in the alternative on who is going to parent her or him. genuine some adoptees are made to experience that they might desire to be grateful to their adoptive mothers and dads. yet, are actually not some organic and organic babies made to experience a similar way. Generalizations can continuously be made yet i think of each adventure is diverse. i be conscious of i did no longer experience scorn from my mothers and dads once I started my seek for my organic and organic mothers and dads. i became supported.

2016-10-14 01:05:09 · answer #4 · answered by sooter 4 · 0 0

The indentured servants took too many smoke breaks.

2007-10-25 10:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by Nicole B 5 · 2 1

Well, it failed because they weren't permant laborers, or basicly, slaves. When their service ran up, they were given land as stated in most agreements, and maybe a law. Eventually, this dried up and slavery picked up.

2007-10-25 11:27:29 · answer #6 · answered by Buffy 4 · 1 1

It took too long to pay off the debt and they kept getting deeper indebted to the land owner for their board and room while they were working off the main debt for them bringing them over here.

2007-10-25 11:03:00 · answer #7 · answered by Frosty 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers