I also notice the meaning of "The Dream Act" is really a nightmare for Americans ; the "Fairness Doctrine" is anything BUT fair ; "Political Correctness" is usually not so correct..and "free healthcare" for everybody, isn't free ; on & on & on . What is the similarity in much of this ? Could it be..brainwashing of sorts..or what ?
2007-10-25 09:59:16 · 15 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You have to understand the mentality of the people behind the ideas. War protesters are willing to become violent for their beliefs. Why you ask? Well to me its simple. They are afraid to actually join the military and fight, so they have to take out their feeling of shame on the people they become violent with.
War supporters on the other hand tend to be mellow and most of them have either been in the military and know what the active duty people are facing, or they have a family member that's in the war. The result is that they don't feel the need to lash out with physical violence. Yes, if you piss them off they will attack verbally, but generally they don't become physical because they don't need to.
As far as the programs that are designed to "help" minorities. Its a bunch of bull$hit! Minorities need to stop blaming everyone else for their problems and realize that its themselves that are the root of the problem. Perception is everything!
2007-10-25 10:16:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You are correct to notice that those programs and events that help a liberal cause always have names and titles that have little to do with what the normal definition of the act would be to an educated person. This is because if the liberals told Americans what they were really up to they would get no support at all.
2007-10-25 17:39:45 · answer #2 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Let's take a look at who promotes/funds those "peace protests" shall we?
From www.unitedforpeace.org:
CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Communist Party USA
Democratic Socialists of America
Freedom Socialist Party
Greenpeace
http://www.unitedforpeace.org/downloads/National%20Member%20Groups.07.16.07.xls
I see a bunch of communists… Hmm go figure.
Communist Party USA:
•Maoist group formed in 1974 as an offshoot of the Progressive Labor Party
•Seeks the violent destruction of America's capitalist economic system
•Called for the assassination of President Reagan in 1984
•Was a key instigator of the 1992 Los Angeles race riots
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6197
2007-10-25 17:40:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Probably because peace protesters only mobilize when they don't get their way. Support the war rallies only mobilize when a war is going on to show support. If a war wasn't going on, then believe me the support the war rallies would get violent.
Good points on the named-bills. I propose new legislation to ban naming bills with anything beyond HR ####.
2007-10-25 17:10:38 · answer #4 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The only violence at anti-war protests that has been documented has been on the part of pro-war counter-protesters--or police.
The anti-war side, on the other hand, does not attack or attempt to silence their opponents--we are people who actually practice AMERICAN values like respect for free speech, instead of giving them lib service and ignoring them when convenient.
As a result--ther e is violence at anti-war demonstrations, bt not at pro-war ones.
2007-10-25 17:07:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I'm with you. We really need to think for ourselves. Difficult as it may be, since news-outlets are overwhelmingly controlled by a very small number of people with an apparent agenda.
...
2007-10-25 17:12:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Dems name their acts following what they learned reading "Animal Farm."
2007-10-25 19:10:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Police/FBI have been know to infiltrate protest groups to start riots. Search Montebello Qubec on YouTube.
2007-10-25 17:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by zombi86 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Because the far-left only wants peace on their own terms.............
2007-10-25 18:04:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would like to know what evidence you have to back up your statements.
2007-10-25 17:34:21 · answer #10 · answered by nonymouse 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋