2007-10-25 08:52:54 · 28 answers · asked by Rita 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Friends
One true friend, Because 50 friends probbably wont stick up for you and of course if you get in a fight with one of em the rest might just leave. one true friend is much better because they are someone you can trust and talk to, you can get into trouble with them and do all sorts of things. one TRUE friend wont leave you unless you are a bad person, and even then they will try to change you first. So personaly i would much rather have one true friend than 50 friends, because the fifty friends probbably are not even friends.
2007-10-25 08:58:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's EASY---One true friend is worth 50 more friends who aren't worth anything. Friends who take, but cannot give, I don't need. Friends who try too hard to please, well, let's just say, they usually have other issues, which I don't have time to deal with and they usually don't want help anyway, they want sympathy.1 or 50... how many will be there 10 years from now? Who will stay during divorce, a birth, a death, moving to another state, etc. ?? that's the real question.
2007-10-26 01:11:06 · answer #2 · answered by JerZey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If having a choice between 50 friends and one true friend I would say one True friend. When the sh*t hits the fan the 50 will scatter and leave you holding the sponge and bucket. The true friend will bear through it and deal to help you out.
2007-10-25 10:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by Lorena 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
50 true friends. Just kidding. One of course...in fact I just
threw out another crammed phone book, keeping the #'s
of people that actually call me and are supportive and
loving. All the party people have faded into rock & roll
oblivion...it was interesting to read it through though to
see sort of a mini diary of my life for the last ten years.
Ten years ago I had the same catharsis and in the
long run, I still have the same core of about 20 good
friends...all people of humor and creativity. No drones.
2007-10-25 11:51:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would take 1 true friend over 50 "friends" any day...the 1 true one will be like Jesus..they will never leave you or forsake you, even after the 50 do.... :)
2007-10-25 09:15:50 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. "Diamond" 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather have one true friend over 50 party friends anyday.... not that knowing 50 people to invite to a party isn't a good thing, it livens things up once in awhile, but when the party's over, I'd still rather have one good friend to trust, talk to, and share with over 50 aquaintances who are only interested as long as the partying lasts......
2007-10-25 11:01:39 · answer #6 · answered by beatlefan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
50 friends, 1 true friend always turns out bad for me.
2007-10-25 13:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by robink71668 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Friends are something extremely special, most of us will only know one true friend in their entire life if they even have that one, for having a friend requires being one too, and that my man is extremely hard, and most people will not or don't know how to be a friend, much less have one and keep them.
Having said that, all of us can have many acquittance's of which we have fun with, confide to a point in and live on the stage of life with. But they are not what a "friend is", the acquittances we know are just people hopping along in life with. So.......in answer to your question.
I would want to have that one true friend that knows me, loves me, understand me, and will be there for me ....in turn I will be the same for them and with that we will manage to grow, learn and give to the world something it needs badly...love for the sake of love and nothing else.
2007-10-25 12:33:30 · answer #8 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would say one True Friend. When you have a lot of friends, sometimes it creates some Mistrust in yourself or in one of them, when one of them tells another of your Friends that you had mentioned something about her, and that is when the trouble starts, between you and them. when I went to School I was always a Loner, but by Choice, I knew how trouble between Friends might separate some of us, so I always was alone, I did talk with my Classmates, but that was as far as it went, and I had always liked it like that. Even when I attended College.
2007-10-25 12:07:08 · answer #9 · answered by a.vasquez7413@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither having one or many is relevant to 'being.' You are here to be true to your essential nature and give your gifts to the world-at-large. An attachment either way is still an attachment - and an impediment. The friends are not the issue - the emotional need is.
2007-10-25 09:05:36 · answer #10 · answered by MysticMaze 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋