... why it has a “perceived” bad connotation?
Can anyone actually put this into the correct context besides just cheerleading and namecalling?
2007-10-25
08:30:53
·
6 answers
·
asked by
blackhawks4life
3
in
Sports
➔ Football (American)
And how its “initial” controversy has affected the other major sports? (and at different levels? High school, collegiate, pro?) (talking the modern era now, not back in the early 1900s)
2007-10-25
08:46:07 ·
update #1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Running_up_the_score
some food for thought ... and perspective; (not that wikipedia is the automatic source of truth)
2007-10-26
05:40:12 ·
update #2
Just as I thought …
it appears that either no one knows the history OR just decided not to share their knowledge by answering the question.
Either way, I think this issue pivots on a few points …
- Do boxers run up the “score”? I wonder why not.
- If pros are paid by their accomplishments, and have their contracts arbitrated (which compares their results (aka “stats”) w/ their peers), shouldn’t they put their best foot forward? Since, it IS a business, and it IS their livelihood.
- w/ the exception of baseball, in the era of salary caps, aren’t all pro teams given the same “baseline” to be good? (i.e. there is more parity in pro sports)
- if a game is already “decided” before the clock runs out, then why is the loser still given chances to score? Get off the field then. Obviously the game is NOT decided.
- Playoff berths can come down to ties, which can be decided by points scored.
2007-10-29
05:19:40 ·
update #3
- Several teams have shown the ability to orchestrate jaw – dropping comebacks, implying that a game isn’t over until the clock has expired.
Since no one referenced the TRUE history in their answer, I will give best answer to the person who best exemplified the principle. It’s totally different when the Florida State of the 80s and 90s beat up a Div II school, and when the Pats blow out their competition. Totally different. When the Redskins were put on the Patriots schedule, did everyone say, “oh look, another EASY game against an unmatched opponent”. No, because they’re both PRO TEAMS! But, being the typically ignorant Americans that many of you are, most do not even know how to make a consistent argument.
2007-10-29
05:20:11 ·
update #4
Case in point “unwritten rules”. Um, if it’s unwritten, then it’s NOT a rule, and you CAN’T hold anyone accountable to it. Another case in point, “ms berlytea”. I’m neither a Pats fan or anti- Pats fan, but I don’t see anything wrong w/ them winning by large margins and trying to score late. The more I hear people badmouth the Pats, the more I find that I’m supporting them, because of other people’s stupid arguments. Unfortunately, your comment confirms that you are exactly the type of person that this question was designed for. Not only did you totally misunderstand what I was asking, but you came up w/ an unrelated answer which was supposed to somehow excuse your ignorance of the subject, and then tried to insult me by mis – stererotyping me; implying that I was a fan of the Dolphins. When the ironic reality is that I support what the Pats (and any other high scoring, competitive team) are doing. So your ability to judge can be compared to your ability to comprehend. Abysmal.
2007-10-29
05:20:32 ·
update #5
Silly little girl. Obviously your ignorance precludes you from performing such a simple task of doing a simple internet search and informing yourself (albeit, not a guaranteed correct answer, but at least some perspective). So you are basically CHOOSING to not only BE ignorant, but REMAIN ignorant. Your answer also implies that you’ve never really had any experience in any type of competition or in a team atmosphere. After all, you don’t need to be a professional athlete to have an opinion about professional sports. You just need to be able to caveat your opinion by stating that you can’t speak from experience. Anyway, good luck as the Lunch Lady. Hope that works out for you.
2007-10-29
05:21:06 ·
update #6