2007-10-25 06:38:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't know what Hillary would do but i would use all the closed military bases.
2007-10-25 06:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I have no clue how she thinks she can accomplish this. If it involves federal aid, then it also must be funded by our tax dollars.
The mention of using some of the clased military assets is a good one. I would add in allowing a non-profit business to use some of those facility to EMPLOY the homeless people being housed. That way, they may be able to pay enough rent to cover the cost of housing maintenance.
Gus, you cracked me up! "unbiased media"! You should do stand up!
2007-10-25 13:46:39 · answer #2 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
By seizing your home to house the homeless on behalf of the greater good.
She has already stated she plans to take from you to give to others.
Don't know about you...but that is socialism in my book.
Think I am kidding?
Who said this?
(1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
(2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few, and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."
(3) "(We) can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
(4) "We have to build a political consensus, and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground."
(5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
(6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy - that they are being watched."
Now you might think these were the famous words of the Father of
communism, Karl Marx.
And you would be on the right track in thinking so.
But you would be wrong.
These pearls of socialist/Marxist wisdom are from non other than
our very own, home-grown Marxist. . . .
Hillary Clinton!
Comments made on:
(1) 6/29/04
(2) 5/29/07
(3) 6/4/07
(4) 6/4/07
(5) 6/4/07
(6) 9/2/05
2007-10-25 13:44:39 · answer #3 · answered by flaming_liberal415 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Didn't you get the memo? The problem will just disappear and not make the papers anymore. It is only an endemic problem caused when a Republican is president. There was no homelessness and everything was rosy under Bill Clinton (D), but a disaster under Bush 41 and Reagan before him. See how it works? The press reports the problems when they want to, but rest assured, death could be knocking on your front door but as long as a democrat is president, the papers will report it all sugar coated.
2007-10-25 13:44:18 · answer #4 · answered by Wayne G 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Oh..you can bet that the liberal media will look at everything Herthighness does through rose colored glasses. Homeless will disappear...no media coverage for protesters, unless pro-life...no media coverage about anything until the tax bite hits them big time, then they will say, to late...oh ****! What did we do?
2007-10-25 14:00:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Homelessness falls under local government
2007-10-25 13:43:40 · answer #6 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
She can't ...nobody can..I love the "how can Hillary ' questions, despite the fact that nothing has been dopne in the last six years to help the poor. You can't complain about other people's plans to address a problem when your plans are nothing. Well, you can, you just sound silly doing it.
2007-10-25 13:44:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Funny how flaming_liberal stated nothing but absolute facts and still got a thumbs down.
I guess libs can't accept the truth even when it's thrown right in front of 'em.
2007-10-25 13:51:28 · answer #8 · answered by scottdman2003 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
In the tax payers houses along with the illegals>
2007-10-25 13:42:32 · answer #9 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Slumber party at Bill's.
2007-10-25 13:48:18 · answer #10 · answered by thor_torkenson 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋