Was Machiavelli machiavellian? I have to do an essay on it and I'm not sure quite where to start.?

Answer 1

Not much is known about his personal life, his famous book was written on behalf of the Medici's. Most of what we know indicate he didn't practice the philosophy espoused in his book. A good share of the content may have come from Lorenzo the Great, who did practice much of the work.

Answer 2

i don't know if this would be applicable. But you could look at how people use the world machiavellian today. Who is called that, what kind of plans are considered machiavellian. Look where authors use it in books or newspapers. Then look at what Machiavelli really was and what he was talking about. By todays twist on the definition, would Machiavelli be machiavellian. Just a suggestion

Answer 3

That's a great question, lol. Like, did Frued have suffer from Fruedian slips? Did Bonaparte Napolean have a Napolean complex? Did Jesus call himself a Christian? Or a Jesuit? Was Karl Marx a Marxist? Does George W. Bush tell other people "sorry, that was a Bushism?" I think all of these questions answer themselves, you just have to prove it. Show how Machiavelli was machiavellian. You know the answer, just show it. Feel free to use this in your essay and good luck.

Answer 4

Just type in Machiavelli Machiavellian in your web browser and you will come up with several articles about the subject. It will give you all sorts of ideas.

Answer 5

The Prince wasn't writen on behalf of the medicis it was writen to suck up to the medicis, which it ironicaly failed to do despite it becoming the most famous "prince manual" in existance. I would suggest you read the prince and an article or two on machiavelli then maybe a biography if you can find one, once that is done outline the paper then write an appropriate thesis and then write the paper based on the outline keeping an eye on relevance to the thesis and change the thesis as necessary

Answer 6

Well, to begin with, do you understand what being Machiavellian is?

If you don't, then you need to refine that definition. If you do, take a look at a biography of him sometime. Then, see if the definition of being Machiavellian applies.

Answer 7

i became a setup and that they took the bate. understanding the republicans are attempting to bounce on any probability to take down Obama. The Republicans in simple terms have proceedings without recommendations. you besides would see them attacking police, fireman, college instructors, postal worker and every person else the prevalent public loves. they have forgotten with regard to the democracy. And the democracy would be people who settle on.