Yes, she's a thousand times more honest than Hillary. If we are to have a woman, let us have one who does not go to polls and focus groups to decide what she should say.
2007-10-25 11:05:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by dogge 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm a Republican. i might vote for Ann. i might additionally vote for Lou Dobbs. i does not vote for Michael Moore. (i do no longer think of any of those human beings have something to do with the others in spite of the undeniable fact that. Lou Dobbs should not be placed in a itemizing with Michael Moore, nor ought to be Ann Coulter).
2016-10-14 00:22:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All the "knowledge" displayed on here couldn`t fit into an Ann Coulter sentence !! Every so called opinion or statement against her on here is nothing more than a re-run of a daily Liberal Socialist Bias` Medias` Newscast Spin. Not one of these idiots has the common sense to check anything out for themselves ; It`s called "exlax-eum" , you take it and it goes right through you , no stops , no questions asked . In one end , and just like it came in it, goes out the other end ! Where were all you self proclaimed self righteous see all , know all "critics" when you had James Carvell running loose like a maniac under Slick Willie for 8 years ? Most of you haven`t got a clue of Coulters` stance on anything other than what your Liberal Socialist Bias` Media tells you ! The Liberal Bias` Media let that clown Carvell run wild and free for 8 years ,, and not once ever held him to the same objective condemnation as they do Coulter . Never called Carvell out once , never held him accountable for anything , never asked him to prove and justify every frigging word he uttered as they do Ann Coulter .
2007-10-25 09:54:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, I would not. She is nothing but a vile political assassin. In fact I will also not be voting for Al Franken here in the state of Minnesota if he wins the Democratic nomination to take on Senator Norm Coleman for the US Senate seat for the exact same reason.
We need people in office that can actually work with the other side and appreciate that others have different opinions and views. Both Coulter and Franken are clearly unable to do this.
2007-10-25 05:08:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
I agree w/ her a lot, but there are occasions i think she goes too far. I think though she mainly does it to piss the libs off and to keep her name in the news...ya know the controversy she stirs up is good for business b/c it makes everyone curious to know what she is all about.....as for president, i am not sure, but heck i cant even decide on one outta the candidates we already have.....
2007-10-25 05:26:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by tll 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Go figure!! Honest, blunt talking from The White House!!
2007-10-25 13:42:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nunya Bidniss 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I generally agree with her political policies but not her approach. She is very clever, but can be very nasty and hurtful. Her approach works well for a commentator but would be awful for a commander in chief. Plus she has no government experience.
I do read her columns. She brings a lot of useful information to light but actively seeks to be "outrageous," which ultimately makes her money but hurts the cause.
To each his (or her) own! :)
2007-10-25 05:06:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would vote for an Alan Keyes/Coulter ticket...she could be Alan's Hatchet Woman....
2007-10-25 05:00:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I would. She is actually a very smart woman. Maybe a little too hostile toward the liberals and creates controversy, but she says what the rest of the right would love to say to the liberals. I love pissing off liberals too!
2007-10-25 05:01:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by libsticker 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
No, while I often agree with her, she is way to emotional to be President. She needs to calm down and her views would be better heard.
2007-10-25 05:07:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by neveragain 5
·
1⤊
2⤋