CNN stated this morning, that the fires in California were started by Polar Bears that were displaced because of Global Warming that were trying to bring attention to their plight...how can Al Gore make money off of this?
P.S. I am just showing how stupid some of these Liberal Questions are today...Fox saying that Al Quiada started the fires...come on now...get a grip...
2007-10-25 04:36:37 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BOO: anything heard on CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, or ABC shoudl really be taken with a grain of salt...I was watching CNN in Spanish yesterday, my wife is Colombian so I have that channel, and they were show all the anit-Chavez protestes in Caracas...but you did not see that on CNN, why? Because they love Chavez... I just wanted to show how stupid some of the questions are getting on here...I saw at least three so far saying Fox is blaming the fires on terrorists...which is a lie...I agree there are stupid question on both sides...the scary thing is some people agree and beleive them...
2007-10-25 04:44:13 · update #1
Steve C, Zeet and others: If CNN is so great and unbias, why have they not shown the protest in Caracas? But if Chavez, while in the bathroom rubbing on out, made a remark about Bush it would be the lead story...you make fun of how people blindly follow Fox news, which I really do not what either, but believe everything that is on CNN and the others...why did the other channels not talk very much about the Medal of Honor awardee this week? Was it because his parents said nice thngs about the President???? If can not call the kettle black if you are a pot...
2007-10-25 04:50:17 · update #2
Troll Boy, I mean Itchy...I really do not watch any of them, but I would have to see the context which they are pulling it from...if they said it then they were wrong...just like Global Warming did not cause this fire...I have been on this earth for 34 years and every year there are fires in southern California...nothing new...I bet there will still be fire 1000 years after I am gone...so if what you say is in the right context, then both sides are spinning it...Global Warming v/s Terrorism...I feel sorry for these people, but they probably all had insurance and will get millions off these fires...if my house burned down I would be sad about the pictures and stuff I lost (I have them all on disk in a fire proof safe at my parents house) but I would not worry because I have insuance...and fire is in the policy...
2007-10-25 04:55:17 · update #3
To each his own I suppose, but you are right...some people (without naming names!) are going too far in their judgments. The main thing that needs to be of concern to people is getting those fires taken care of so the people of California can get on with their lives.
2007-10-25 04:40:51 · answer #1 · answered by Scooter_The_Squirrels_Wifey 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
On Fox, I heard the fire's cause is arson and that the fires may have been started simultaneously.
But yesterday, I heard Harry Reid blame the fires on global warming. Wow!!! I mean, the truth of the matter is California has been getting a little colder lately. Last year, So. Cal had that freeze that wiped out the citrus crop, so, yeah, like I can really see how global warming starts fires. . .
2007-10-25 12:58:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yesterday on Fox News there was an alert at the bottom of the screen that said
…...FBI: Al Qaeda may have started the fires……
The report that they got this info from was four years old, however the people on Fox news where saying that this info was only a month old.
I keep waiting for them to apologize for their mistake!
2007-10-25 11:53:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do like how the vice-governor try to make it political right off the bat.
People saying they didn't respond fast enough.
They forget a little fact planes that drop water can't do it in winds of 100 mph.
I think democrats want to make this out as another Katerina despite the facts.
2007-10-25 11:50:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's all just a big game to get Americans divided. We have some news stations saying one thing to get some Americans believing one thing and another news station saying another to get another group of Americans believing that.
In the end, it divides Americans. And a house divided will surely fall.
Americans should be prepared for this once great nation is headed for a great fall.
2007-10-25 11:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem with cable news is, there's too much of it. When there's no worthy news they end up with too much time on their hands, therefore the over-analyzing. The sad truth is you can probably get more accurate news about this country from a foreign source...now that's sad!!!
2007-10-25 11:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by Fern O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. All you have shown is how stupid Republicans are. You are mocking people suffering in California and the serious problems facing our country from global warming. This is a great country and is worth defending. I am tired of you Republicans attacking America.
Why are you claiming that Fox making up a story about Al Quieda starting the fires is an example of stupid liberalism. It seems like that too is an example of fanatical Republicanism run amok.
And I can't believe the ridiculous extremes that some people go through to put out their own brand of political propaganda. Yes, some of the fires were started by arsonists, but do you really think that the ground would be so dry if it weren't so hot? Southern California is suffering from a record drought caused by global warming. That has made the fires worse. You can't seriously believe that all of us are so uninformed as to believe that dry tinder does not burn faster and hotter than wet tinder.
2007-10-25 11:42:49 · answer #7 · answered by buffytou 6 · 2⤊ 7⤋
actually Fox did mention it...as did the radio station I listen to in the morning...
Only because the CIA retreived documents from Al Qaeda operatives a couple years ago...showed plans to start fires in America. I don't know if it was this specific....in fact I doubt it...
But regardless.. CA wilfires are nothing new. At least one of the fires were arson....but who knows.
2007-10-25 11:42:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
In the spirit of stupidity representatives from california are blaming global warming for the fires.
Now I heard a report that 2 of the fires are arson related. So, how in hell did global warming procreate an arsonist or two? And will there be a video on youtube soon?
2007-10-25 11:41:40 · answer #9 · answered by ken 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Part of the Bush conspiracy.
First he caused 9/11
Then Katrina
Then the wild fires
Can't wait to see how he is going to pull off a 9.0 earthquake throughout the States. Of course Cheney is really the one to push the right buttons to make them happen after consulting with Rush and Ann Coulter.
2007-10-25 11:45:07 · answer #10 · answered by labdoctor 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋