English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They showed on Star Trek one night, fire, which looked like red/yellow molecules floating, bouncing into each other. Is fire a specific molecule?

2007-10-25 04:31:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

5 answers

Fire is the release of energy caused by a specific kind of chemical reaction (combustion, or oxidation); ie, it is basically the energy released when bonds break. As bonds break they release a certain amount of energy, depending on the bond type and the nature of the particles being joined. This energy is emitted in the form of photons, and you get different colours of fire (red flame, blue flame, etc) because of different amounts of energy released. More energy released means a more complete combustion reaction and/or more energetic bonds being broken.

Specific elements also release specific bandwidths of light, too, hence flame atomic spectrometry, where you basically spray some of a substance into a fire and observe the colour of light produced. This is caused by the excitation and subsequent drop in energy of electrons. The electrons absorb energy, getting kicked up into higher excitation states, and then they release the energy so as to return to a more stable ground state.
In other words, molecules don't have specific colours, but they can release specific colours of light.

2007-10-25 05:08:52 · answer #1 · answered by QEChem 3 · 0 1

a million. almost all the international as quickly as believed the Earth revolved around the sunlight. attractiveness of a concept does not talk to certainty. So I reject this as data of the supernatural. that's severe to observe that in the time of straightforward terms some people come to a end approximately god independently. The overwhelming majority are born into faith and a great share stay in cultures/international places the place rejecting the commonplace faith merely isn't an option. ultimately, the life of one or extra gods isn't the only clarification. it may desire to in straightforward terms be that the human suggestions progressed to locate solutions to make experience of this international, with a low emphasis on whether the respond believed is actual or not. i think of that's a extra helpful clarification than positing a god. in many cases although, maximum of mankind has not believed in one god, or the comparable gods. The mere certainty of the huge selection of religious ideals is data to me that gods are a guy made thought. If there became into truly a god, you will assume the international's religions to be very comparable in the time of mankind's historic past, and that's not what you locate. This additionally helps the thought huge concept in gods is extra by way of human nature than something supernatural. 2. i don't understand what brought about the massive bang. All you furnish is theory. you may desire to instruct your many recommendations approximately gods and singularities. without evidence there is not any reason to think of your claims approximately god(s) are actual. 3. No, i won't sense god. not even while i became into religious, religious, and tried truly stressful. I truly have before felt all related with each thing. That became into in straightforward terms a feeling. a helpful one, yet not one that suggests (or is data of) a genuine connection. 4. ok, now i think of you're trolling. some thing created skill there's a author? Please. Faces on different planets? ultimately random floor helpful factors will resemble a human face, we've seen that with burn types on toast. The "face" on Mars has been debunked - that's became right into a made of shadows and lacking information. end: you furnish no truly data to assist your arguments.

2016-12-15 08:49:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, fire is not an element.
Fire is the release of energy during the transformation of an object from one substance (like wood) into another (like carbon).
After all, we now know that all matter is just frozen energy.
If you want to get any deeper into this, you'll have to take a physics course.
PS You look so much like mine Guvoornator! Ich haben ein Arnold!

2007-10-25 04:41:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

No. I'm not a trekkie but I assume that it a bit of computer wizardry What you see as fire will be hot combustion products or burning particles (sparks from a wood fire for example)

2007-10-25 04:38:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Fire is not molecule
Fire is not element too
Fire is energy which is emitted in form of visible light and heat

2007-10-25 05:50:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

agreed. These guys just about summed it up. For more, always consult wikipedia when you have one or two word questions like "fire."

Back in junior high school I coined that fire is "visible kinetic energy," to which my bio teacher told me I was very close.

2007-10-25 05:30:00 · answer #6 · answered by elecbass100 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers