For $200/ Month Dems Can Insurace a Rich Kid or Feed 10 Kids Who Will Starve to Death in Africa. Which is...?

Question

... more important?

Answer 1

African kids are Africa's problem...when these countries spend the aid that is sent to them to buy weapons or to put in their own pockets, it means it is time to stop all aid to them until the corruption is fixed...

Answer 2

You only have to look at the above answers to see how delusional and short sighted some Democrats are.

We can do both. LOL.

Maybe you should have phrased your question like:

For $200 a month, we can:
- Insure one rich kid
- Feed 10 starving children in Sudan
- Feed 10 starving children in Chad
- Feed 10 starving children in Ethiopia
- Feed 10 starving children in Angola
- Feed 10 starving children in India
- Feed 10 starving children in Congo
- Provide better educational opportunities for one child
- Provide capital for farming equipment purchase in Pakistan
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Etc........

Do they not understand that there are only so many resources, but an unlimited number of causes?
And you can only "tax the rich" so much, before there are no rich left to tax.

Answer 3

I say spend 400/mth and do both. Repeal tax cuts to rich Americans and both can be done with the money saved.

Answer 4

Like you give a flying fvck about kids in Africa.

Answer 5

Until every single american is covered by medical insurance and not one American goes to bed hungry I say no aide to any other country.

Answer 6

Both can be done. Your rich kid premise has already been proven wrong. You might want to catch up.

Answer 7

You need "insurace" to pay for the anti-psychotic medications that you need.

Answer 8

Our own people should always come first