thanks!
2007-10-25 03:44:26 · 14 answers · asked by Ms. Sarcastic 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ron Paul
Because he is the only candidate who will get us out of Iraq immediately. He knows our soldiers are not supposed to act like police to protect another countrys borders on US Taxpayer dollars. Its not worth the lives lost or money spent.
He is the only candidate who voted against the war, and against the patriot act.
He is also the only candidate who would stop illegal immigration & formation of the north american union.
He is also the candidate who has written the most, and has HUNDREDS of articles he wrote online for you to research.
2007-10-25 03:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul
1. We will leave Iraq
2. We will not go to war with Iran
3. We will spend our own money.
4. Inflation would be almost completely gone by the Gold Standard.
5. We will get our civil rights back.
2007-10-25 07:11:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not either a Republican or Democrat. I'm a Libertarian. My choice is Ron Paul (who is a Libertarian running as a Republican). He's the only truly honest candidate in my opinion. He doesn't want to be president for the power. He wants to fix the messes that our country is currently facing.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
2007-10-25 04:26:32 · answer #3 · answered by skullklipz 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Democrat or Republican ? All politicians their mouth are full of crap!. I may vote for Hillary Clinton if she wins on Jan.5 I like to see a woman in leadership. She is too smart, strong roll model, and a good speaker. Republican, I haven't seen anything good yet.. still waiting.
2007-10-25 05:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by beaupamer 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
More and more, Ron Paul, although I just cannot see him securing the nomination.
I do see him as the most principled and perhaps right-minded candidate.
2007-10-25 04:54:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dont have a favorite this time around. None of the candidates reach out and grab me. There are more candidates that I wouldn't vote for than ones I would vote for.
2007-10-25 03:48:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Without a doubt, Ron Paul. As someone stated earlier, he is the only person running who has a consistant record of being against the warmongering of this administration.
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
Probably one the THE MOST truely patriotic individuals to ever run for President.
2007-10-25 04:27:35 · answer #7 · answered by willie l 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Democrat - None, they are all pretty bad, but I especially don't like B.O., Hillary and Edwards.
Republican - Not sure, none of them seem to stand out and the front-runners seem too moderate (much like W).
But the bottom line is that if it comes down to the evil of two lessers, I will vote Republican.
2007-10-25 04:32:55 · answer #8 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Republican - I wish Newt Gingrich would run. He seems to one of the true conservatives left in Washington. I have taken the "Who do I vote for" quizes on the internet and it all points to Rudy G. or Fred T.
2007-10-25 04:41:09 · answer #9 · answered by BL1957 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
John McCain, most consistant and exploitive of lobbyists. He is a moderate and an American hero in his own right unlike any other candidate on either side.
he has the most experience and can be trusted.
2007-10-25 03:51:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋