What is Shillary's proposal for the Iran problem?

Answer 1

Exactly what, in your opinion, is the "Iran problem"?

And since you cannot spell her name correctly, you obviously have no interest in an honest answer.

If she proposed invasion, you'd call her a warmongering bulldyke in the same corporate pockets as Bush and Klan.
If she proposed continued sanctions, you would accuse her of being in bed with terrorrists, ready to sell America off to the highest bidder, all while trying to socialize the US into some huge "Nany Nation".

I guess the question should be, What would YOU like Hillary Clinton to propose about the "Iran problem"?

However, I would HOPE she proposes sending you and the rest of your pseudo-patriotic buddies right on over to Iran and bring real soldiers home, home so they can try to find replacements for the jobs their employers gave to some East Indian or Taiwanese while they were fighting in Iraq, to try to pick up lives they had to put on hold while fighting and dying, to justify Bush's ego and his Big Oil campaign contributions.

Since all you rich Republicans won't "support the troops" by risking everything right beside them in the battlefield, can they at least count on you hiring them for a good living wage, when and if they DO finally return? Or will it simply be more, "Hey, if they want to make more money, let em go earn it the honest way", or other such "Compassionately Conservative" sentiments?

I find it especially revealing of the whole "Compassion" thing regarding conservatives (in Yahoo Answers at least). All day yesterday, while stories about the wildfires in Southern California were all over the news, not ONE conservative "question" in Yahoo Answers asked ONE thing about how were victims getting aid, not ONE outpouring of sympathy of grief for the 6 people who had died in the fires at that point, NOTHING.
The only quesitons they asked were, "Didnt Arnie look GOOD?" and "California's on fire, millions (?) displaced, death and destruction, should we "Cut and Run" from California?" "How many FEMA trailers are going to CA for actors to live in the rest of their lives?" "Isn't it SHAMEFUL Harry Reid said what everyone else knows, the dryness of the trees and brush, the droughts in S. CA., which have made the fires so all consuming and devastating, are attributable to Global Warming? How DARE he "politicize" this event (not TRAGEDY, not CRISIS, it's just an "event" to cons)?"

And so on. Not one question meant to convey to the rest of us that ANY of the trolls currently circling the drain in YA have any humanity or even simple empathy within them, for hundreds of thousands of people suddenly without homes or possessions.

Makes ya proud to be one of Newt's "Compassionate Conservatives" doesn't it? I know it brings a tear to MY eye...

Answer 2

I concur Bert. Aside from the ignorant ranting of FOX news, what reason is there to fear Iran? I mean, come on guys, this is the same country that Saddam went toe to toe with for eight years. To believe they could or would attack America is to completely disband belief. Iran's support of Hezbollah is propably the most sited reason for an invasion, however Hezbollah is a resistance movement against foreign involvment in Lebanon. And while many attribute several terrorist attacks to them, none have been proven to be an actual attack by Hezbollah, and they denounce the accusations, something a terrorist orginazation would never do (the whole point of being a terrorist is to insight fear to bring attention to your cause, denouncing your involvment in one of your own attacks would only serve against your cause). Also sited, is their attempt at created a nuclear bomb. Not only do the best analyst say that Iran could not possible create a bomb for at least 10 years, but what possible reason would they have to use it against America? It is no secret that they are not particularly fond of our culture, but it would be suicide to use a bomb on us. Iran is by no stretch of the imagination a real threat to America. If ever there was a country to put military pressure on for supporting terrorism, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan would be the prime choices.

Answer 3

From recent "distant places" comments i've got study, Israel isn't in basic terms waiting, yet turning out to be very "agitated" that there maintains to be s postpone. final Saturday became the "remaining date" for Iran or perhaps earlier then, Iran thumbed its nostril. The state of affairs for this "ultimately" is magnificent. Israel assaults Iran......Iran shuts down the straight away and "assaults" Israel. We, with a militia Alliance, now strike at Iran. the two Russia and China have explicitly reported.......do no longer attack Iran, whether the U.S. or Israel. The unknown volume ? Russia. they have already "threatened" a militia reaction, if we and Europe start up development the Missile protection device. think of.....this present day and age and Russia threatens "militia" responses. Who will come to Irans tips, if we'd desire to attack them ? Russia ? or China ? difficulty is. What if Iran incredibly has stopped all enrichment and are finding at nuclear ability ? no remember what, ONE miscalculation or misinterpretation and we'd desire to be heading into our nuclear "winter".

Answer 4

Hillary wants to go to war with Iran.
There are hundreds of millions she can make off that war.

There isnt any other reason she wants to leave our soldiers over in Iraq as they are forced to pretend they are candy dispensers and police.

She needs thm there for a attack on Iran.

Answer 5

Shillary's plan is exactly what is happening now.
She's more than happy to pander to the Military Industrial Complex.

Answer 6

Okay, I'm ready to pay my 10.

Spartacus, I'm wondering if you've been checked for Bi-polar Disorder.

One post: Will a Thompson/Hunter ticket win all 50 states. (Yeah supporting the republicans)
Next post: Will Neocons attack Iran. (implying that there is no problem in Iran) (Yeah, attacking republicans)
This post: You admit there is a problem in Iran and wonder what Hillary will do about it. (Yeah attacking Hillary)

I'm beginning to wonder if you have a stand.

Answer 7

Whatever she proposes is going to be more intelligent and better thought out that anything that warmongering Bush will propose. Bush's foreign policy has been a disaster.

Answer 8

That woman is a lunatic. She would probably bomb Iran quicker than Bush would. She would do it just to prove that a woman can be strong.

Answer 9

I have heard her say that she CAN'T say until she is elected President and is able to see Intelligence reports. Who keeps them from her now? She is an almighty Senator from New York!

Answer 10

Who knows, she changes stances at will.