I don't personally - I think it is another step toward the total ruin of the country I love.
2007-10-25 02:52:40 · 14 answers · asked by El Duderino 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That damn cowboy and his itchy trigger finger will be getting us in trouble like we have never seen before if we attack Iran at this time. We need to use diplomacy and sanctions before we get bomb happy.
2007-10-25 03:03:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A better course of action is to blockade Iran so that it cannot make money from the export of oil.
Iran receives 80% of its revenue from the export of oil.
If you shut off the export of oil and revenue to Iran, you shut off the ability of Iran to buy nuclear weapon technology on the black market.
When the President of Iran threatens ot wipe a sovreign nation off the map, it is clear that Iran should not have nuclear weapons.
Permitting Iran to have nuclear weapons is like permitting an antisocial three year old to have an assault rifle.
Blockade Iran, and you shut off the revenue that Iran needs to buy nuclear weapon technology.
.
2007-10-25 10:14:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO.
Iran is like a 2 year old throwing a tantrum. Tantrums are best dealt with by ignoring them, but you watch them without watching,... I'm sure any parent here can explain that premise.
Diplomacy is the only logical course of action... but we have a trigger happy cowboy and his trained chimp in the Oval Office, and there hasn't been a shred of logic there since day one.
2007-10-25 10:05:41 · answer #3 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I honestly think that if Iran does not comply with the UN Sanctions, that something has to be done. Look at what ended up happening in Iraq when we just let it go for so many years. I get so frustrated with people who don't understand this. Who elected us in charge? Everyone did - when they ask for our money and relief and aide....think about it...they ask us to step in then...we have to do it. We have to protect everyone else.
2007-10-25 10:12:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think attacking Iran is idiotic.... and I can't believe the arrogance of this admiinistration to even imply that they may do this given the fiasco that they have already led us into. They are not good at this war stuff.
2007-10-25 10:08:28 · answer #5 · answered by cattledog 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neocon rumormongering, Iran is no threat to US National Security.
2007-10-25 09:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by Spartacus 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. But I wouldn't be surprised if we go to war again anyway. Our current administration seems to be all about war, power and oil, of course.
2007-10-25 10:18:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. If we attack Iran, they are going to go full-bore into Iraq and start a bigger clusterf*ck than we have now. If you attack someone, they have no reason to hold back anymore.
2007-10-25 09:56:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
No, which is why bush and cheney need to be run out of office as quickly as possible.
2007-10-25 09:56:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
It's a lose lose situation and sun tzu said stay away from lose lose situations.
2007-10-25 10:09:28 · answer #10 · answered by huckleberryjoe 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋