Why shouldn't they make a contribution
2007-10-25 01:59:08 · 4 answers · asked by McQ 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Bexhols : I should have expanded to mean people who are unemployed
2007-10-25 02:29:25 · update #1
Sure. I think they could staff the unemployment offices instead of those jobs being outsourced to the Philippines, for example.
They should also be required to attend job training/retraining. Substance abuse testing should also be conducted on them monthly, and benefits stopped after 3 consecutive positive tests.
2007-10-25 02:05:29 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Royal family receive all their money from the government too. Does that mean they have to perform community tasks too?
2007-10-25 02:29:56 · answer #2 · answered by Hope 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depending on their situation, they can perform community tasks here in California through a program called Welfare to Work.
2007-10-25 02:08:21 · answer #3 · answered by Emily & her mommy love Da Bears! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i work but recieve benefits i get child tax credits to make up my income so what u mean is if when i come in from work i have to go out and clean the streets to recieve the extra £100 per week?
2007-10-25 02:07:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋