2007-10-24 20:58:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I wish it was possible. That was the very last time our country enjoyed true freedom in all aspects of life.
2007-10-24 21:08:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I'd rather have a third term for Bill Clinton than a third term for Bush
2007-10-25 04:28:00 · answer #2 · answered by xg6 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - Don't get me wrong, he's better than either Bush, but I disagreed with NAFTA and with what he did to our intelligence agencies. Also, the entire four years would just be wasted by one side trying to find him guilty of something else, and his side defending him. We would better off with a President who could actually get along with both sides - maybe time for a third party candidate?
2007-10-25 04:04:51 · answer #3 · answered by nytebreid 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes, the monica lewinsk scandal shoulldn't be a part of this. He was sa good presidet and ever since he got out our country is going down the tubes. I would take him over Bush any day
2007-10-25 04:06:10 · answer #4 · answered by Ben Z 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Oh yeah, and it can happen! If he were to be the V.P. nominee with Hillary running, then she resigns he would be President! He just can't run three times, no rule against serving three times though!
2007-10-25 04:04:28 · answer #5 · answered by grouch2111 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes he prove 2 be better then bush. all bush did was start a war
2007-10-25 06:07:33 · answer #6 · answered by mysterybryant 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Absent that, Al Gore.
2007-10-25 04:01:40 · answer #7 · answered by iNsTaNt pUdDiNhEaD 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think he's good.
2007-10-25 04:19:26 · answer #8 · answered by Nicey 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure why not. Our country was in pretty good shape when he as in charge.
2007-10-25 04:02:12 · answer #9 · answered by Mark D 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
sure he kinda seemed to have things runnin some what smooth
2007-10-25 04:03:10 · answer #10 · answered by Not a Good Role Model 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋