English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We read that Kate McCann bleated “I don’t know how anyone could harm anyone as beautiful as Madeleine. I don’t mean her appearance, I mean as a beautiful person.”

Actually Kate she was a child of only 3 years old, and you left her in a creche every day and on her own every night while you went out drinking, bit late to realise now.

If Kate had paid more attention to her childs beauty on and before 3rd May none of this would have happened ?

Source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2733299.ece

2007-10-24 19:46:05 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

22 answers

The press print much cr@p today..I notice the headline. It refers to sobbing Kate. I am concerned I may have watched a different interview than everyone else as I did not see any tears or any sobbing. Is it the interview where Kate keeps referring to the NEW number. You know...."we have a new central number" "you can call the NEW number" "Please help Maddy and find it in your hearts to call ..on the New number", NO KATE!! Just call..Call ANY number, call the freephone crimestoppers number in confidence, call your local police dial 999. The new number did not need to be emphasised. I know some people don't like calling the police, fine call the media instead then, after all isn't that what the parents did?It really gets to me how the media hype it up and miss out the important bits. Kate Sobbing, Kate breaksdown in first interview, Gerry and Kate angry and emotional.. RUBBISH!!
OK, I am ready for the thumbs down now.

2007-10-24 20:04:44 · answer #1 · answered by Charley 4 · 27 8

Your right neglect is the theme here.To all those stating they made a mistake they didn't mean her to get snatched well it could of been all their children they weren't in the next room or on the balconey they could not see their room from the bar they were neglecting their childrens welfare what if there was a fire or the children had got up and been run over.I can not understand those of you saying they didn't mean to THEY DID IT.

2007-10-24 22:51:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

i agree entirely with you, i am 28 and have four small children, i have given up work so i can spend time with my children instead of putting them in a creche and i only go out with my hubby once every 4 weeks as the only person i will let babysit my precious children is their nana, every holiday we go on the children never leave our side, when we go out for a meal they are with us, i just wish that kate had put her childrens safety before her selfishness want to go out with friends

2007-10-24 23:53:45 · answer #3 · answered by emmamac14 6 · 6 0

I don't know why, but the parents look so awfully guilty...

I would never ever leave my baby children alone especially in a place you do not know that well.

I would'nt even leave my 11 year old brother alone in my house let alone a foreign country.

I do feel so sorry for them that they have lost their beautiful baby, but people only learn from theri mistakes.

This woman now knows NEVER to leave her babies alone!

I hope some day she is found.. xxx

Please everybody Pray for Madeline tonight before bed.. xxx

2007-10-25 00:42:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

well said!! and good one for pointing out that Maddie was only three when she went missing, the papers and Pro's all try to say well she was nearly four, whats the difference, what I tell you what the difference is, she was three when she went missing but the MacMeeeee's thought; GIRL 3 MISSING sounded worse. these Macmeee's make me sick and I have actually stopped buying my daily paper because I am sick of seeing their sanctimonious faces every day.

2007-10-24 23:34:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Everything said, and it's true.
Have a star.
Just add that if somebody is keeping her knowing that the McCanns have all that money, wouldn't try a ransom???...

2007-10-25 02:08:51 · answer #6 · answered by Tim 4 · 4 0

She is totally unbelievable and false. She says " I feel she is in someones house, I don't know why" Yeah right, what a load of bull. She knows exactly where her "beautiful" daughter is. It's just a pity she hasn't got the decency to tell the truth so little Madeleine can have a proper funeral. This rehearsed and controlled interview didn't fool anyone. What wasn't shown on uk tv is that afterwards Gerry was filmed saying to Kate "Don't say anything else until they take your microphone off" He obviously couldn't risk her saying something that wasn't rehearsed. It was just more McLies and McSpin from the McFraudsters.

2007-10-24 20:55:56 · answer #7 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 18 4

Kate only needs to look closer to home and see who the culprits are.

2007-10-24 23:21:24 · answer #8 · answered by little weed 6 · 8 1

i think she looked very guilty, and if that was a breakdown, i cry more when i am cutting an onion, but i agree u should never leave ur kids and as doctors they should know

2007-10-24 22:04:58 · answer #9 · answered by HELEND 6 · 6 1

Its really beyond me how people can keep saying that it was a 'mistake', it was 'foolish in hindsight'. Its neither it is plain and simple stupidity.

2007-10-24 23:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers