Ron Paul ?

Question

What do you think about him?

"A man who thinks the world would have been better off if we hadn't fought the Nazis in World War II is not the type of person I trust running anything." Proof?

Answer 1

I think the good Doctor should go back to practicing medicine and offer it free again to his patients.

He should not try to bully his way onto the Republican ticket, because he could not make on the Libertarian Party platform.

He is a true Libertarian and not a Republican. He will not get the parties support no matter how loud his supports type.

Answer 2

I will simply put it this way. Ron Paul takes his oath to the Constitution seriously as his 20 year record in Congress shows.

If someone has a record of ignoring the law just to empower themselves what does that say? If another person (RP) has a record of obeying the law and their duty to their job what does that say about a person?

What I'm simply trying to say is that Ron Paul obeys the Constitution. He does not "pay back" special interest for supporting him. He knows that the Constitution guarantees us right that is slowly being taken from us. We need Ron Paul more then Ron Paul needs us. Ron has lived a full good life with the blessings of liberty and freedom but our future and our children's future is what is at stake.

Educate ourselves on the Constitution and why the check and balances and the protection of our freedoms. If we didn't have that protection then what kind of government would we have....history shows what kind of government we can have.

Once you learn this I think you to will agree Vote Ron Paul in 2008!!

Answer 3

He doesn't think we shouldn't have fought the Nazis. He thinks that war should be declared by the congress as the Constitution says. He thinks that war should be declared for defense only. We shouldn't be running around trying to pick fights with everyone in the world.

Answer 4

Well....... did you ever stop to think that maybe WWII (or World War I for that matter)would have never happened to begin with if we the United States of America would have never adopted a full Fiat money system? Every war this country ever fought previous to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was always funded through fiat money. What better way to kick off this phony system than to get us involved in the creation of WAR. Ever wonder why we have been in perpetual wars since its passing? also heres a ltl food for thought. Did you know that of the 3 largest oil producers in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia was the only country that would denominate their oil in US dollars? No.2 Iraq and No.3 Iran would not. Would you if you knew it was mere fiat currency and you were the only one offering something of substance?(i.e. oil). If we were to begin running gold and silver currency in parallel with the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE again, watch for who screams the loudest. Actually we should have all already turned our govt inside out on just learning our money is merely printed out of thin air. And how exactly do you balance a budget with fake(monopoly, i refer to it as this because the Federal Reserve Bank is in fact a privately owned bank with no competition) money. Keep in mind, money is meant to be only a means of exchange, not a way to control nor have power over a population.

So yes Ron Paul is truly the best, obvious and common sense option we have. All others merely pale in comparison. Actually they don't even compare.

The bullshit lies are over kids. So quit it.

Answer 5

Are you quoting yourself or someone else with the world war 2 bit?

Answer 6

Just found out about him today and like what he has done politically with his voting and what he has to say about the direction the country should take. I will vote for him, there is no wasted vote because my vote is my freedom to choose!

Answer 7

i like him and id like to see that link. i think you misunderstand the story or they are lying to you.
(trying to give you some credit). but Ron Paul would support ww2 because there was a declaration of war , and that is what he wants with Iraq , something we still haven't done. id also like to say we were egging japan on, do you ever think they might not of attacked us if we were not doing things to provoke a response. sounds kind of like this war doesn't it. don't get me wrong we were right to fight in Europe, but we didn't know it then. you are stating your opinion from the vantage point of 60+ years from that time.

in the 20th century the US attacked and bombed:

China 1945-46
Korea 1950-53
China 1950-53
Guatemala 1954
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-60
Guatemala 1960
Congo 1964
Peru 1965
Laos 1964-73
Vietnam 1961-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Guatemala 1967-69
Grenada 1983
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Panama 1989
Iraq 1991-99
Sudan 1998
Afghanistan 1998
Yugoslavia 1999

I'm not including the 200,000 Filipinos and Filipinas whom the US murdered in the late 1800s when we invaded the Philippines.

How many of those countries attacked the US?

Saddam Hussein was originally placed in power by the US, and was our ally, which is why we armed him in his war with Iran. The US did not give a damn how many Iraqis or Iranians were killed. In fact, the administration encouraged the deaths of both. Henry Kissinger commented, "Too bad they both can't lose."

World War I? the US administration purposely got us into it by loading the passenger liner Lusitania with munitions. That's why it went down so fast when the Germans torpedoed it. the German government ran full-page ads in the Eastern newspapers telling people to stay off of passenger ships. There was no reason whatsoever for the US to get involved in WWI. World War II? WWII was a direct result of WWI. World War II would never have happened if the US hadn't gone along with the crushing reparations against Germany, allowing Hitler to rise to power. And the Great Depression - caused by State interference in the economy, not "capitalism" - also helped Hitler's rise. The Japanese wouldn't have attacked Pearl Harbor if the US hadn't cut off their oil and other imports, and sent the Flying Tigers against them in China, egging them into a pre-emptive strike against us. And the evidence is overwhelming that FDR knew the Japanese were going to attack, and let it happen so Russia wouldn't have to fight a two-front war against the Germans and Japanese.

Korea? I don't remember Korea attacking us. I don't remember North Vietnam attacking us, either. And I certainly don't remember Panama attacking us.

We cannot change human nature, and we cannot legislate/force others to be honest, thrifty, safe or intelligent. They must do it on their own or bear the consequences.

The price of liberty is far more than simple vigilance. The price includes the integrity to accept complete personal responsibility for our lives, safety, property and welfare. The price that so many find hardest to pay, however, is the integrity to leave everyone else alone to do the same.

Answer 8

ron paul has clearly stated he is not a pacifist - he has stated time and again that those responsible for 9-11 must be hunted -he did not see the link between the 9-11 attacks and Iraq because there was nt one -and forewarned of the problems we now see there -
you seem to be very misinformed and must want the continuation of the following
-the Iraq war
-policing the world
-exporting of US jobs
-devaluation of dollar
-income taxes
-loss of rights
-corporate socialism
-neocon agenda
-socialist agenda
-unsecured borders and ports
-bigger and bigger govt
-more regulation
-less security with promises of more
-slow economy
-higher taxes(we will have to pay for it one day )
good luck with that -

Answer 9

I think he is the only honest and true to his word person running for president. In fact other than him the options are all about the same and will end in the same result bankrupt country heading down the way of more war loss of more liberty and turning into the NAU.

Answer 10

Ron Paul is a defender of our Constitution and the last hope to restore our national soverignty