English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-24 16:39:07 · 4 answers · asked by reaganite27 5 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

He could be called a dark horse, but that doesn't mean he is a real and viable contender.

After Huckabee made those ignorant comments about the Iraq War (you break, you buy) I quickly wrote him off my list. Obviously, the guy has no knowledge of history or of our complex and misguided Middle East policy.

He simply attacked Ron Paul by talking about our troops and throwing out the word "honor."

But he failed miserably to win the argument.

I'm backing Ron Paul.

2007-10-24 16:52:39 · answer #1 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0 0

Hes not the dark horse candidate because he has no chance of winning. He may be a good man but the sad thing about politics is you have to have name recognition and he does not.

2007-10-24 16:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by Jonesboy374 1 · 0 0

Why even waste the bandwidth for this guy. He has about as good a chance of being President as Crazy Fred, a nut who runs up and down our street in a bathing suit while waving an American flag.

2007-10-24 16:48:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't want sound childish, I really don't. I've liked a lot of things he's had to say, not all but a lot. But in all honesty, could you really imagine saying "President Huckabee" with a straight face? Just imagine an introduction at a G8 summit.

2007-10-24 16:44:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers