The regional government is expanding the main thoroughfare in front of a commercial property, therefore limiting access to the property. They will not allow vehicles to make a left turn into the property, or a left turn out. Although they claim safety to be a reason for this proposal, is this still an act of expropriation?
No land from the property affected will be taken.
2007-10-24 15:34:30 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The property owner and any occupiers fully assume such a risk. There is NO legal recourse.
2007-10-24 15:51:36 · answer #1 · answered by Shell Answer Man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. Suppose they built a median strip which did not allow a turn, that would not be considered expropriation.
2007-10-24 15:43:00 · answer #2 · answered by cattbarf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think this is so. The government does not think this way... they pretty much do as they please under little known and obsure laws.
2007-10-24 15:38:16 · answer #3 · answered by Decoy Duck 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋