"It would be very singular that all planets, all nature, should obey eternal laws and that there should be a little animal five feet high, who in contempt of these laws could act as he pleased, solely according to his caprice." - Diderot
2007-10-24 14:22:09 · 14 answers · asked by Orpheus Rising 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
All animals pursue their best interest, the interaction and balance IS Nature.
It is silly to call the behavior of all other animals natural, then somehow conclude man's behavior isn't natural.
All animals modify nature, as far as I know, man is the ONLY animal that concerns himself with how these changes affect the rest of the animals.
2007-10-24 14:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The laws are what they are for balance to be maintained. Physical laws at this level can not be overcome unless you become the law, until then you are subjugated to all law. It really wouldn't be so much overcoming these natural laws rather than you becoming a universe within yourself. The organic laws are just reflective of higher laws of mind, there is gravity upon mind as well.
Often times one object or condition initiates another, so its mostly balance which the laws provide. If you bring about complete inner balance and harmony of mind and being, what could hinder one whom has become a universe unto themselves? To overcome the law you must embody the law, since the physical laws are only illustration of greater laws and the objective of all laws are to maintain balance or promote the need for balance to be achieved, if you overcome the law which is embody it then you become it and it will appear that you can break specific laws, but rather this is not so much the case then you having actually become the Law, harmonious and law/force is subjugated to you. But what I am essentially saying is something that so few have accomplished and takes much development over the course of life times to achieve, like Yeshua/Jesus. Until then all you can do is utilize the laws to accomplish things, that is learn them and move with them to your destination. The physical laws are for the good of all things.
Beyond this freewill is an illusion, if you consider the many laws that exist in the physical, upon the mind/soul as well.
2007-10-25 01:01:53 · answer #2 · answered by Automaton 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Automation even to-day replaces the working guy the subject is how can we pay the working guy a salary while he does not ought to artwork .the flexibility to supply products via device is greater dramatically while the pc is put in the situation the place the worker stood much greater the pc can artwork 24/7 no concerns so definite the working guy may be loose in case you seem on the artwork stress mandatory while each and every little thing substitute into executed via hand the see what has take place in the final 50 years what do you think of will take place in the subsequent 50 years I doubt if there'll be adequate artwork around to furnish each and every physique a 5 hour week in no way suggestions a 30 hour week The question is actual what can we do with each and every of the spare time If it style of feels i'm speaking nonsense think of approximately how lots working time is spent making ineffective issues or perhaps making conflict products whose purely purpose is to smash This internet site ought to enable itself the diversity to seem to the destiny based on the real understanding we've already at our finger coaching there is something incorrect if sensible individual can not see previous their very own view and see the destiny probabilities of course WARS can carry back the form in spite of the shown fact that it can not end it i seem forward to seeing some suggestions on the way it rather is executed there is one disadvantage what's going to people do with their spare time if no one is giving them orders
2016-10-04 12:48:16 · answer #3 · answered by dorais 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Understand Diderot: if that creature is "singular" then he is alone. Diderot's point was that no such creature exists and that all nature obeys the laws of nature.
"To rule nature, one must first obey nature."
2007-10-24 16:10:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We are indeed free to break the laws of nature. For if we were not -- freedom has no existence: the consequences for exercising that freedom, however, is what Diderto points to, the tax we pay for exercising free will.
2007-10-24 16:15:49 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Stedyedy. We're not capable of breaking natural laws. Nature is more reason than law. We suggest, practice and sometimes protest unreasonable use and treatment of nature.
2007-10-24 15:06:12 · answer #6 · answered by HBVmmvii 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only do they break the laws of nature, they also have the will to make it happen! So sad!
2007-10-25 17:23:44 · answer #7 · answered by Monk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural Law cannot be broken. If we attempt to circumvent law we are broken, it is called "pain". If you believe you have violated natural law and got away with it, your understanding of natural law needs updating.
2007-10-24 14:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by stedyedy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think we as a race believe it's okay to mess as much as we possibly can with the laws of nature. I personally believe that if you mess with nature, then nature will mess with you.
2007-10-24 14:30:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
People make laws, and people break them. Nature just exists.
2007-10-24 17:04:38 · answer #10 · answered by Kristian D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋