If so, there is no way to know it for sure, and the real question would still not be answered: how it all began. If the Universe does oscillate like this, the term "Universe" would include all other incarnations. Instead of it having one beginning at the Big Bang that we presently theorize, it would be cyclical.
2007-10-24 14:25:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brant 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
So far we have not observed that elementary atomic structure just collapse spontaneously. Atoms as well as the Universe maintain a stable equilibrium.
So if the Universe 's celestial bodies are expanding in the volume of the Universe, does that mean that atoms lose their stability and that mass structures will dwindle into dust, .
And then spontaneously reassemble themselve to form new solars system and new planets?
I do not thinks so ,that this would occur as per the present rules of Physics.
2007-10-24 14:59:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We only do no longer be responsive to if there have been earlier universes that have died. i individually evaluate it rather probable. Theories now evaluate that there are parallel universes to us, occupying an identical area yet in yet another measurement. Strictly speaking, our universe is drawing near its demise. by employing 10^a hundred years from now, it may desire to have thoroughly evaporated. There incredibly is a very, very long term to bypass yet. there isn't any longer something to help your beginning question. the super Bang is a good clarification to account for the actuality that each and all and sundry count number in area jointly with galaxies and great great black holes is dashing outwards from an significant area and far off from itself. dark count number and dark power are only lots of the unknowns that are under analyze. no count number if the super Bang became a authentic journey or no longer is only open to talk. yet, like each and every gods, it may provide a proof for a manner issues seem.
2017-01-04 09:49:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well one of the theories is that the Universe has collapsed and expanded over and over again.
You heard of the 'big bang' theory. The contraction of the Universe is called the 'Big Crunch'.
2007-10-24 14:23:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by bum_for_3_months 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nah..........lol just kidding
This is where sciences meets it limits
I am pretty sure that it doesn't matter whether there was another universe before this: If you really look at it, Its all the same thing
"Energy Can never be destroy"
"Energy = Time" (C) F28
With out energy time doesn't happen..
If You look at the word universe what does it really mean,
is it just a word we made to call the unknown something?
2007-10-24 15:21:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by John Smith 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, its certainly possible. Its one of several theories.
But we don't know, and we may never know - the theory of cyclical universes suggests that whatever came before the Big Bang is completely beyond detection or observation.
2007-10-24 14:26:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very possible. This theory was recently worked out mathematically by a professor at Penn State. Here's a link that talks about it. http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/07/01/
2007-10-24 14:33:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by eri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure. Anything's possible.
2007-10-24 14:20:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋