of telling us about what they will do?
2007-10-24 13:42:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I would say it's the "cart before the horse" scenario. They can't out do the Pres. since he runs the U.S. So they focus on ousting him, and then they are free to show us how much they lie. Really, I can't point the finger.....yet.
2007-10-24 13:54:23 · answer #1 · answered by delux_version 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Today I'm brief.
In most cases, candidates find it easy to promise before having the tickets for a "luncheon."
They are quick to for get after the first soup sip taste!
Their motto becomes " For God and my stomach"
They are no longer nationalistic leaders but corrupt, dormant heartless...
They kick away the Flag from their hearts and become wolves...
You have an obligation to help the "peasants" to find a meal otherwise, the political, social, economic war will never stop unless change takes course.
UN should help in any way possible.
there's need to check the war sponsors and supporters if the war it to end.
The main brain behind the war must complete it. Otherwise, Its hard to just comment and predict its requirement to totally end.
Jackson M
2007-10-25 17:02:33 · answer #2 · answered by Jaykson M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you do believe actions speak louder then words, someone could say the same thing about you.
2007-10-24 20:46:50 · answer #3 · answered by ~Think About It~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you on this, wholeheartedly. You know what they say...
"With the right words, you can change the world!"
They're probably just lazy bums telling us what they'll do to keep us warmed up about the situation. "Are they gonna do it?" Is what everyone is going to wonder. They're keeping us on our toes. I think they're too lazy, don't you think? They might regret not taking action later, trust me.
2007-10-25 04:12:18 · answer #4 · answered by The Time Traveling Magician 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has been my observation that the candidate that provides the least information is the one that gets elected.
The media decides which candidates are the "serious" ones, determined by notoriety, not real ideas or actual productivity.
2007-10-24 22:25:28 · answer #5 · answered by charley128 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because preventing war is hard... and living in harmony with each other is harder... y? i dont know
2007-10-27 04:37:48 · answer #6 · answered by JGamer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They really don't care. They are all in it for money and power. Liberals and conservatives are one the same.... pathetic and greedy.
2007-10-24 21:30:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are thinking it will be over when Bush leaves office.
2007-10-24 20:48:06 · answer #8 · answered by ChuckDeucez 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they probably think it'll be over soon maybe... hey what about all those charity workers helping out though?
good point
2007-10-25 13:58:42 · answer #9 · answered by *~Rux~* 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because, they will say almost anything to be elected, then they wake-up and the dream is over.
2007-10-24 21:17:45 · answer #10 · answered by 'Old & Cudley' 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋