I think we can do a lot better in diplomacy and i think that Ahmadinejad came off better than we did.
Ithink the govt acts like kids sometimes and this guy should be heard and we should form our own opinions, rather than filtered ones and he has some decent arguments
but then i think that region is generally thought of as unstable, thats a hard door to close, and the potential threat to us in the future.
http://www.oylinki.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=276
2007-10-24 12:24:45 · 16 answers · asked by wilde 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I don't think any country should have nuclear capabilities.
2007-10-24 12:28:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Ahmadinejad might have come off better to you because he hit on all the democratic talking points. Are you insane to think that anyone who threatens to annihilate a nation who refuses to acknowledge that a massacre of millions of people did not take place when it is a proven historic fact. Who preaches the coming of a maniacal Messiah and his intentions to help bring destruction to the west should be reasoned with? Should be considered a decent human being? That diplomacy should be our only resort with a maniac like this. A man who claims homosexuals do not exist in his country. Thats because there either killed or thrown in prison just like anyone else who shows dissension in his country. You need to look back in history there was a man who preached what this man preaches and his name was HITLER. There where those who though they could reason with him diplomatically they were proven wrong and not until after millions of innocent people were slaughtered did those peace makers wake up. Thank GOD there were men like Winston Churchill and president Roosevelt who saw this man for what he really was and knew that his ultimate demise would be the only thing that would bring peace to our world. Wake up mr chamberlain you are being duped.
2007-10-24 12:40:02 · answer #2 · answered by fraz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if we could INSPECT ON SITE, they should be allowed nuclear power for PEACEFUL purposes only. If they had nuclear weapons, they could dominate the entire region and control ALL THE OIL. If you don't mind paying $ 15-20 for a gallon of gasoline, go ahead and vote for giving them nuclear weapons. If not, support our President and the awful choices he may have to make in the very near future to prevent that.
2007-10-24 12:29:07 · answer #3 · answered by Mike 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear weapons NO!
Nuclear capabilities yes!
2007-10-24 12:26:57 · answer #4 · answered by Craig C 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If Iran had nuclear weapons we would be blown off the map and so would Israel. Anyone who thinks Mahmoud isn't such a bad guy is f***ed in the head, I think he may actually be the anti-christ.
2007-10-24 12:28:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's see how diplomacy works when he launches the first missle on Israel or us. NO
2007-10-24 12:28:28 · answer #6 · answered by Dianne m 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You seem to do a lot of thinking if its to be it will be [it is the way of this crazy word that we live in]
2007-10-24 12:30:10 · answer #7 · answered by Jim 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-10-24 12:29:17 · answer #8 · answered by ~~∞§arah T∞©~~ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
nope they shouldnt they are the last people to have that nuclear power they already dont like us
2007-10-24 12:29:08 · answer #9 · answered by ALEXIS W 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would be great if nobody had nuclear capabilities.
2007-10-24 12:27:29 · answer #10 · answered by grouch2111 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋