O my God! All of them are evil and all of them are lying liars.
2007-10-24 12:00:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
9⤋
George Bush, and I'll tell you why: because, unlike his son George W., he at least is aware that there is a distinction between truth and lies, even if he doesn't observe it in his public statements.
You can tell when Dick Cheney isn't telling the truth, because he goes into hospital. You can tell when Fox News isn't telling the truth; it's when it's on the air. You can tell when Coulter, Limbaugh and the rest of them aren't telling the truth; it's when their lips are moving.
2007-10-24 12:20:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You really aren't giving any great choices for credibility. But of all, I'll go with FOX news. None of the networks have that great of coverage though. For a better, unbiased view of the US according to the rest of the world, I would place my bets on BBC and Reuter news.
2007-10-24 12:17:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by genghis1947 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
All of them except for Ann Coulter.
2007-10-24 12:09:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I seem to be the only one who will pick the least of evils, but I think Fox news actually reports the news squeezed in between their fair and balance reports, so at least part of what they say is believable. However you have to know what is actually happening in the world to know which parts.
2007-10-24 12:08:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by meg 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
What would "Conservatives" do if all of them had a different viewpoint on a singular idea.
They would resort to the one thing they have problems doing, thinking for themselves.
2007-10-24 12:54:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They are all a bunch of liars but I would have to say Fox news. They do report things kinda sorta true once in awhile. Non-political stuff they get right.
2007-10-24 12:06:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Coulter if she is acting normal. She is the only one that printed the true about how many things adult stem cells help and that the other tyype had had no success. If Savage, Franklin and local news anchor are neocons.....
2007-10-24 11:56:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by R J 7
·
8⤊
5⤋
You named the most radical amongst radicals. None of them are believable but they are all consistent in their personal gain and selfish interests. In trying to determine the biggest liar, I'm going to go with Dick Cheney leading the pack. He, at least, is the most influential, since he has been acting President for the last two terms. All of the rest tie for second!
2007-10-24 12:00:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by ArRo 6
·
7⤊
8⤋
as a loyal listener to Mr. Limbaugh, I know that he brings only FACTS to the table!
2007-10-24 12:07:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Sxe Phil youtube.com
2007-10-24 11:55:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
7⤋