Over the last day or so a number of McFanns, eager to point the finger at anyone other than Kate and Gerry, have picked up on a story about the Police re-examining Robert Murat. However what the McFanns failed to mention is that the actual story is this...
'The main theory of the investigators is that Madeleine left the apartment and went looking for her parents while they were having dinner in the Tapas restaurant. Half-asleep, she fell down ten stairs and died accidentally. Her body was found by Gerry McCann who then asked for help from Robert Murat, described as a friend of the couple by the paper'
Now why did the McFanns forget to mention this bit ?
Source: http://www.newsdeskspecial.co.uk/2007/10/murat-hid-madel.html
2007-10-24 10:12:44 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Lancasi - not even remotely close - sorry
2007-10-24 10:31:10 · update #1
Teddy - I NEVER exploit the real victim, Madeleine McCann, misery. But I do question the actions of the MAIN SUSPECTS and their supporters, if thats what you mean ?
2007-10-24 10:37:47 · update #2
I know I read it. I also asked again on here if the McCanns knew Murat prior to the "disappearance" as I knew he was involved in translating afterwards.
I remember the interview where Gerry was asked if he knew Murat and said he wasn't prepared to comment.
Well you would just say no, if not I would have thought.
Oh well we will see.
2007-10-24 10:17:21 · answer #1 · answered by !Lady Stormy! 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Looks like they could ALL be in it together but what I can't understand is why the Tapas gang accused Murat on day one if he was helping the McCanns. Seems like snitching on an accomplice.
There is definitely some reason why the pj still have Murat as a suspect.Hopefully next month when they are all possibly allowed to see the files which the PJ have then they will all start accusing each other.
2007-10-24 11:07:12 · answer #2 · answered by little weed 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I haven't been watching this circus as its starting to annoy me.
When the iraq war started i was facinated and supported what everybody told me, then after a while i started to get my own thoughts about it as i slowly studied it month after month. Now im bored and starting to question to whole damn mess.
I feel that you are doing the same thing, asking awkward questions that most people had'nt thought about.
That Robert Murat seems another shady person, or is it me.
It seem everybody overthere at the time is a shady type.
2007-10-24 10:21:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Lets leave it and let the new head of the Portuguese Police do his job. Hopefully, soon there will be some closure to this case.
2007-10-24 13:29:03 · answer #4 · answered by Ms Mat Urity 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yet another wild theory, but I think Mr Murat still has some questions to answer, but I do not know what questions. There is something strange about that man and I just do not know what
2007-10-24 10:20:34 · answer #5 · answered by Scouse 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Mention what! Robert Murat is innocent until proved guilty like the McCanns. I am not going to lose my integrity and accuse Murat.
Please read my question including the additional details
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkBv4RTG3Yi5wGfrsZ_fJ2ogBgx.;_ylv=3?qid=20071023034510AAHolNn
2007-10-24 10:18:24 · answer #6 · answered by toietmoi 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋
I agree with damned, you will be quoting from palm readers next.
2007-10-24 20:41:23 · answer #7 · answered by James Mack 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Time will tell. The five steps
2007-10-24 11:26:00 · answer #8 · answered by charlie 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yet more speculative garbage. Come on PJ and McSlamms, where's the proof? Next "theory": Maddie was abducted by aliens. There's just as much evidence!
2007-10-24 10:21:18 · answer #9 · answered by PuppyPrince 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
Why re-investigate an innocent man...........stick with Kate and Gerry....they know the truth.
2007-10-24 10:18:34 · answer #10 · answered by Chris H 3 · 7⤊ 4⤋