Why can't libs understand that Repubs just are better managers in catastrophic situations???

Question

Arnold should have slapped this turd....

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2007/10/24/arnold-grabs-abcs-shipman-demands-stop-spinning-fire-coverage

Poor poor fairly smart. Your not even fairly honey. There's not a Republican no where near New Orleans. Thats why it was such a debacle. Dem mayor, dem governor and your ignorant azz don't even know that...

Answer 1

Because liberalism is a mental disorder.

But don't be tooo tough on them..

Keep in mind that we owe a lot to liberals.

If it wasn't for liberals:
1) There would be no anti-smoking bans that say hey - business owner, you invested your money to establish a business by taking your own risks, but you can't make you own decisions on how to run your business because you must succumb to how we regulate you to do so. (Scratch liberty and pursuit of happiness)

2) You wouldn’t have to carefully pick your words, and never speak what is truly on you mind because you can now be prosecuted for words that may be found "offensive" while on the job. Since there is no clear definition of what is "offensive", you basically may never again talk about anything that has any consistency or conversational value. (Scratch Freedom of Speech)

3) There wouldn’t be continually rising taxes to support a continually expanding socialistic society dependent upon welfare programs due to the same programs causing great jumps in inflation and decreased value of the current dollar.

4) We would still be a capitalist society where if you come up with a good idea, and a business plan you can succeed in life without constantly having to worry about being sued for frivolous cause.


Things the liberals almost succeeded in:

1) All inmates would be on a rotating-door policy in our prison systems ensuring all rapists, murderers, and multiple DWI-manslaughter convicts have the right to multiple chances to recommit their offenses.

2) Almost all laws governing the bodies of each state would be determined by the state, and the federal government would provide little to no intervention...Uhmmm... Liberalists supported slavery?... No, but they supported the idea that each state should decide if it (slavery) was okay. If successful, slavery would’ve never been abolished.

3) Strict anti-gun laws that allow you to only have guns if you go through stringent regulatory requirements that only allow you to hold a gun if you are in a governmental law enforcement position.(Scratch the right to bear arms)

3) Clinton almost provided action (but did not) after the bombing of the USS Cole. The action that should have drawn us into the WAR that O’Salami was trying to wage. A lack of action that later would cause the need for a more detrimental assault on the US to get US involved in the dismantling of oppressive leaders/officials in the middle-east.

Answer 2

i like the lefties who stray from the %. at cases. I observed an answer right here some days in the past the place the drones have been backing Obama re Israel and one properly usual dem pronounced 'oh hell no, he's lifeless incorrect in this one'. I appreciate that. i'm an self sustaining Conservative and that i slammed Bush on Amnesty, on spending, on the habit of the conflict and different subjects. it is the sheep that relatively worsen me. yet it particularly is all YA politics. in the real international I even have liberal acquaintances and associates or maybe kinfolk and we get alongside advantageous. possibly a heated communicate each and every so generally yet you may save issues in perspective and now and returned in basic terms be conscious of while to drop it. in the event that they choose something they be conscious of they are able to call me and it is going the two procedures.

Answer 3

Hey buddy, I'll tell you. This situation in Iraq which I'm sure if you have a son or daughter killed there could be classified as catastrophic. This administration, which I assume the real conservatives are still claiming credit for, have done a spectacular job in managing the situation there. from the unproven claims for getting us into this debacle to not putting enough troops in theater to complete the job to losing 10 billion dollars(they know not where it got to), to the disappearance of 250,000 weapons( don't know where they got to either) to replacing every commanding officer that had the audacity to disagree with them to awarding no-bid contracts to corporate buddies to not having no over site what so ever on these contractor. etc.etc. And then there is Katrina. No need to elaborate there. These people in power has done a real good job in managing!!! God, I'm so proud of this god fearing man in the white house.

Answer 4

Really? What about the federal response to hurricane Katrina? That was well managed? The war in Iraq? That has been well managed?

Arnold is one republican in a largely Democratic state. Who's managing the disaster relief? Arnold isn't doing it all himself.

Answer 5

you're comparing a bad fire to Katrina?

and that's your "proof"? hahaha...

do you realize that Katrina hit a HUGE portion of the gulf coast and New Orleans was only a part of the failures, many in red states?

I think we've all seen how Republicans handle catastrophy in Washington over the past 6 years and their blatant failures...

Answer 6

Dems think the Federal government is one big cash cow. That's why their party is so corrupt. It's just sad to see the so called msm so biased no days. Especially since most people in this country believe everything they say because they can't think for themselves...

Answer 7

Sorry Squeeze, you need to thank the Dems in LA for the Katrina mess. Ask Uncle Ray why he flooded all of those buses.

Sorry folks but if most of you knew what you were talking about FEMA would NOT exist because natural disaster are supposed to be STATE problems, NOT federal ones.

Answer 8

Yeah--that's why the Bush administration sat on its hands while over a thousand people ddied in New Orleans.

Answer 9

Lets not forget it took a democrat to get the US out of the 30s great deprecion which was caused by a Repulican President not on the know of what to do to help.

I have no clue as to what you are talking about, with labeling all together!!!

Answer 10

You mean like the brilliant way they handled hurricane Katrina and the lightning fast reaction time George Bush exhibited while the towers were being attacked.