That SHE does not have the power 'yet' to do this, a truley humanatarian, thoughtfull, correct action, which she does not have the full control??
Who thinks that Billary, ooopppps I ment Hillary, would still do this, if she could not use it in such a way to gain votes?
2007-10-24 06:37:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I live in California and in San Diego. People are getting injured all day long and 6 people died from this. And you are asking a mundane question like that. I am reporting you. You should have respect for evacuates that read this stuff.
2007-10-24 19:28:52 · answer #1 · answered by Tainteddeceptions 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any president would do the same thing. Even a corrupt socialist moron like Hillary would act to protect US civilians and property. The response to natural disasters is pretty standard. Katrina just got messed up because the mayor and governor refused to do their part. The president actually had to federalize the National Guard and strip Govornor Blanco of her command in order to activate them. It was a huge step and completely understandable that he gave her a day to do what was right before doing such an unprecedented action.
2007-10-24 06:47:23 · answer #2 · answered by James L 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are approximately 19 wildfires. in basic terms 3 of those 19 have been a hundred% contained. this might properly be an fairly super disaster because of the reality that lots of the evacuation centers are rapidly being crammed and in specific factors all people remains being asked to evacuate as rapidly as obtainable. many cases those fires are began by probability via lost campers or maybe intentionally via arsonists...nonetheless, no person definitely expects wildfires to happen and grow to be so huge and regular to the place they're complicated to contain. issues in basic terms happen. The courageous adult males and females all people is doing the final interest they are able to to contain the fires, however the santa ana winds are making this job harder because of the fact those winds are in basic terms inflicting the hearth to unfold even speedier. There has in basic terms been one million civilian dying so a procedures, and we are hoping it maintains to be that way. approximately 14 civilians and firefighters have been injured. there is no reason to evaluate this disaster to ones of the previous because of the fact they have been all intense of their very own way. a majority of those failures impact people in any different case. those failures have a heavy effect no remember what.
2016-10-13 22:26:36 · answer #3 · answered by launer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a strange question. You're suggesting that Sen. Clinton, rather than being dismayed as any of us by the fires in CA, is simply jealous because she can't be George Bush and do what any President would do in this situation. I've seen some pretty silly questions about Hillary in this forum but I'm sure this one takes the cake, at least for today.
2007-10-24 06:43:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Huh?
Why would you take a tragedy as a chance to attack Hillary Clinton? That's insane... Attack Hillary however you want on the issues but you look incredibly unsympathetic and obsessive if you stretch a real tragedy into your hatred of Hillary. The firefighters and the house victims right now aren't thinking about Hillary.
Just shut up if you have nothing relevant to say about the tragedy. And just make a different question about her war record or her campaign fundraising... you can attack her on relevant issues. You just took a tragedy and USED it to obsess with someone you don't like... how pathetic.
2007-10-24 06:48:44 · answer #5 · answered by cattledog 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush's actions are actually irrelavent to the election. We'll all forget them.
What we won't forget are comments from liberals like the Lt. Governor of California who insulted president Bush this morning as a result of Bush offering assistance. Eventually, even liberals will realize how disgusting they are. If they wait too long, we'll lost the democrat party, and that will be a shame.
2007-10-24 06:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is so mad shes gonna take a bucket of water and put the fire out herself!
stupid question = stupid answer
2007-10-24 06:46:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary would be sending millions to Chinatown though. Since they have given her millions in illegal campaign contributions..
2007-10-24 06:41:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
She is probably stewing and trying to figure out how in the heck to go get a wildfire photo-op.
2007-10-24 06:40:38 · answer #9 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Probably not upset at all.
She most likely agrees that it is a disaster.
2007-10-24 06:40:56 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋