Best theory of how the fires are Bush's fault?

Question

A. If the troops weren't in Iraq, they would be here to blow the fire out.
B. Global warming, which is all Bush's fault, caused the fires in the first place.
C. FEMA, whose poor performance is all Bush's fault, is not reacting fast enough.

Please feel free to insert D. if you have a better theory on how Bush is to blame for forest fires. Eye witnesses have claimed that a white male actually started them. Could it be Bush himself?

For those who haven't heard any Bush haters blaming Bush for the fires. Harry Reid blamed him today saying that the national guard being in Iraq presents them from helping fight the fire. Of course, six minutes later he denies saying that. Rush Limbaugh has both audio clips.

Thanks for all of your hysterical answers. You've added some humor to an otherwise dull day.

If we can't laugh at liberals, who can we laugh at?

Answer 1

D. The carbon emissions emitted by the troops in Iraq are causing global warming, and this is overheating the engines of FEMA agents who are trying to drive to California.

E. It's an attempt to curb illegal immigration. By torching California, he's trying to make it less attractive for illegal immigrants.

F. He's bowing to the pressures of the Big Fire Extinguisher lobby.

G. Fire from the muzzle of Dick Cheney's rifle started the whole thing.

Answer 2

MoveOn Moonbat Senator Barbara Boxer to announce who is to blame. And who would that be? Why none other than George Bush. It would seem that President Bush has taken the time off from killing children and becoming amused as our servicemen are killed in Iraq to plot these fire strategies for California. And just how is this all Bush's fault? Why, he sent all of those California National Guardsmen to Iraq .... For his amusement, of course.

But the Harry Reid isn't much better. You knew that this had to happen sooner or later also. Reid is blaming the fires on global warming. There is, of course, no scientific proof whatsoever of this ... nor is there any evidence ... but as long as you have a natural disaster on your hands, you might as well find a way to use it to push your agenda. So ... global warming it is!
The truth is that these fires .. well, not the fires themselves, but the severity of the fires .. can be blamed on whacko environmentalists. Every time someone in California suggests thinning out the brush that fuels these fires you have some environmentalist screaming about kangaroo rats or field mice or some such nonsense. I can remember many years ago there was a community outside of Los Angeles that wanted to clear the brush that abutted their homes. The environmental moonbats said no .. they went to court and managed to prevent the creation of a fire break. One homeowner told the eco-radicals to take a hike, and created his firebreak anyway. While the tree huggers were fuming, along came the fire. Can you guess which was the only home in the neighborhood that didn't burn down?
Here you go… Taken from Boortz’s site!

Answer 3

Obama did not reason this and neither did Bush so which you will in no way get any "crap" from me on the two on the subject of the financial disaster. I wrote a piece of writing for between the blog web content the place I with a bit of luck made the case that careful attention could have made greater experience than throwing funds wildly and blindly on the subject. the two Bush and Obama are accountable of that. Pelosi and Reid are waaaaaaaaay accountable! I do have one gripe: while Meet the click has Christina Romer on, i could fairly hear what she thinks than listening to her parrot Obama's techniques. She's meant to be knowledgeable approximately economics in her very own stunning. She's packing a PHD on the concern which in my suggestions makes her doubtlessly lots greater thrilling than Obama on concerns of economics. For the record, i could be only as serious of McCain and Hillary. EDIT Mr. Oneliner: are you able to quantify that answer in real words for me? what number people do you think of ought to starve to death globally over certainty and rights on the subject of the financial cave in? 20 million? a hundred million?

Answer 4

A great conspiracy ...the libs will love this. I know how about, he, Bush, took such heat for not responding to Katrina, that he started the fires himself to show the demwits that he cares.

Or, he did it to flush out the illegals.

Cheney did while hunting.

He is being punished for not getting his shorts in a bunch over global warming.

He wants the Nobel Peace prize.

Trying to rig the elections.

Answer 5

Well, since he was accused of destroying the World Trade Center, lying about Iraq, dynamiting the levees in New Orleans and steering hurricanes, anything is possible!

There are a lot of mentally disturbed people out there.

Answer 6

D. The fires wouldn't have happen if Bush spent more time clearing brush in SoCal rather than around his ranch in Texas.

Answer 7

Yeah...I KNOW he was that white male! Faster than a speeding bullet...able to leap tall buildings...etc. Super-Bush, the Universal BAAAD GUY. LOL

Answer 8

D. The reason Karl Rove resigned was to start the wild fires in Malibu to burn the homes of wealthy Clinton supporters.

Answer 9

Can you cite a reference which describes how Bush detractors and environmentalists have blamed Bush for the natural disaster in So Calif?

Answer 10

D. Bush had Jeb start the fires,while he was on lookout to warn Jeb if anyone was coming.

AD