English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-24 06:15:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

16 answers

The same reason some civilisation used hanging or the electric chair - to kill them and be rid of them.

2007-10-24 06:19:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Apart from the obvious, it was used to make an example and also to create maximum humiliation/degradation (although you never saw it in the films, a lot of them were crucified naked).
Interesting if somewhat macabre fact is that the REALLY bad ones were nailed with hands and feet whereas a more 'humane' method was hands only because the weight of the body hanging (rather than being supported by the feet)would put continues pressure on the lungs and over the course of a few hours would kill you by asphyxiation. Hands and feet criminals would take days to die.
Relatives would bribe their guards to either smash their knees with a hammer or hamstring them so they would not be able to support themselves and, same as hands only, would die a lot quicker. That was the only mercy the family could offer.

2007-10-24 06:46:21 · answer #2 · answered by mark 3 · 2 0

Crucifixion was regarded by the Romans as a punishment fit only for slaves and criminals. It sometimes took days to die of exposure and thirst so it was considered a mercy to break the 'victim's' legs or stab/lance/spear them (as Jesus was) to speed up the process. Crucifixion was used as a powerful visual deterrent (to rebels-slave or free and criminals). Remember that the Romans had invaded and colonised large territories and needed to keep the locals under control.

2007-10-27 07:09:24 · answer #3 · answered by Annie 3 · 0 0

Well, it was a slow, agonizing way to die. And after you died, you were left there to rot & remind what happens when you tick off the Romans.

But it was one of many choices in the Roman execution arsenal.

So they didn't do it to all; it was mostly reserved for the worst of the worst. Those who REALLY pissed off the Romans. Sparticus' defeated slave army was crucified along the via Appia

2007-10-24 06:20:35 · answer #4 · answered by jared_e42 5 · 1 0

As a deterrent to would-be criminals , some prisoners of war and any would-be rebels.Left by the roadside to rot, it was a gruesome sight if a mass Crucifixion had taken place, some lines on either side of the road leading to a major town running non-stop for miles.

2007-10-27 07:11:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just to note, the Romans did not invent crucifixion but "borrowed" it from the Persians. Crucifixion began as impaling; when the Old Testament refers to 'hanging' in the book of Esther and other places it's refering to impaling rather than a noose.

2007-10-24 08:03:26 · answer #6 · answered by Jonathan D 5 · 0 0

Slow, painful death by exposure (the vast majority of the time their injuries consisted only of the nails through the wrist) and a public example of the wrath and might of the Roman Empire.

2007-10-24 06:29:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well if you saw i person who'd been crucified dying a slow and painfull death would it not make you think about commiting a crime.

It was generally used against enemies of Rome as a deterant a ' See what happens if you f**k with us' sort of thing.

2007-10-24 06:31:33 · answer #8 · answered by poli_b2001 5 · 2 0

As a warning to others not to do the same, they were always left hanging untill they rotted

2007-10-25 06:10:48 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

It was the accepted form of judicial capital punishment

2007-10-28 03:04:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers