Whoever has the most aggressive policy toward them. They WANT to engage us. So I'd say Giuliani.
2007-10-24 05:23:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
8⤋
Osmsa big ears bin laden.
I will give the low down about Obama and you may not like it but if you follow the links to the policitco.com articles and read it all you will not like or trust Obama.
He is the biggest liar on the campaign trail.
1.. He used an innocent man in Iowa to get free new and his PR people lied to keep the spin going. This man is a Armenian Physicist here doing some work with some of the most important programs for Universities and the Government. And he was helping a friend in Cincinnati Ohio out with his novelty card business when Obama used him read the links.
2. He is not a Christian as you will not find one Muslim saying a word about his so called conversation from Islam. You can convert to Islam but not away as it is called a fatwa or to us a death sentence. No one word about this.
3. He stated he would invade Pakistan who is an alley on terrorism and barely holding on with eh Islamic extremist there. Which was done by Obama to destabilize this country that has a nuke and I will add the only Muslim country that does. Why would he do this even Hillary knows this is very bad.
4. He last week said he would never use the Nuke which was a signal that if he wins that they the Islamic terrorist who wishes us all to be dead can do it and he will not act. Id this what you want for a president? No look at what Turkey did to Christians and they will end all of the things you love on the left as we are all infidels to them and the left here is satin itself.
2007-10-24 05:48:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
We never gave the terrorist organizations credit for thinking strategically. I rather think 9-11 was accomplished to pull America into war with Afghanistan and possibly IRAQ. I think the terrorists knew that war would be protracted in either place--and they knew the liberal elements in America would not have the balls to continue to face them down. I think they figured that after the liberal left forced America out of these places--they would have Carte Blanche in the rest of the world because there is no way an American President would face up to them and run the risk of getting into another protracted war. I think they realized all they had to do was harass and wait. So I think they would want to see most likely
the young and inexperienced congressperson from Illinois. would buy them at least 4 years of unfettered ability to create havoc.
2007-10-24 05:38:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
1992 Iowa Caucus outcomes: February 10, 1992: Tom Harkin (seventy six%), Uncommitted (12%) Paul Tsongas (4%) bill Clinton (3%) Bob Kerrey (2%) Jerry Brown (2%) If the Iowa caucus change into indicative of the destiny, bill Clinton ought to have in no way been the President of u.s.. slightly more suitable to imagine about: 1988 Iowa Caucus outcomes: Bob Dole (37%) Pat Robertson (25%) George H. W. Bush (19%) Jack Kemp (11%) Pete DuPont (7%)
2016-10-22 22:39:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think the terrorists give two hoots who the next President will be. The only reason their leaders even talk about it is to mess with the minds of Americans. As far as I'm concerned, whatever the terrorists think about our next President is equal to my concern about what my next door neighbor's dog is eating for dinner tonight.
2007-10-24 06:38:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Terrorism is based on anti-American sentiment. Who has encouraged more of this than our current president? I think a change in regime will do everybody a lot of good.
2007-10-24 06:23:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary. They know she is soft on defense and will rather have a talk with them than bomb or use force.
2007-10-24 07:17:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barrack Osama...I mean Obama....you can take the right out of anyone with brain-washing, but you can't take the Muslim out of a hypocrite, and liar.
2007-10-24 05:44:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary, and they hope no one finds out about her dirty little secret. She will downsize the military, just like Bill, and cut back on intelligence, remember, Bill doesn't like spies, and you know he will be their coaching her
She will have conversations with the terrorists and they will promise not to attack us and everything will be all warm and fuzzy..
2007-10-24 05:32:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Moody Red 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
About any Democrat. Then they'll know that the US will cater to their whims.
2007-10-24 05:42:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Princess of the Realm 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary...she will downgrade the military just as Bill did
2007-10-24 05:32:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by fretochose 6
·
6⤊
1⤋