give him ur last name a son is daddys namesake they can only pass down the last name a female wont! u may never have a son again
2007-10-24 05:18:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Angel eyez 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gender doesn't play a role here, but it would really depend on your relationship. If you're planning to marry (and likely adopt the older child, giving them the same surname), then it makes sense to go ahead and give this baby your surname as well.
However, if you aren't completely serious or simply don't plan on getting married, it would be simpler to give him the mother's last name. It just makes things easier when the children share the same surname, not to mention less problematic (assuming she will be the one picking them BOTH up from school, taking them to the doctor's, things like that). It can cause some undue hassles if one child has a different last name than the mother and sibling, if you know what I mean.
Good luck!
2007-10-24 02:26:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Irish Mommy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
James Sanders Andrew Sanders Ryan Sanders Ryder Sanders Rowan Sanders Nathaniel (Nate) Sanders Kerr Sanders Samuel (Sam) Sanders Jase Sanders Dean Sanders Jesse Sanders Lucas (Luke) Sanders Lane Sanders Rex Sanders Tyler Sanders Cody Sanders Kyle Sanders Adam Sanders Stephen Sanders Gage Sanders Nicholas (Nick) Sanders Forrest Sanders Rylan Sanders Graham Sanders Grayson Sanders
2016-11-09 08:46:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by slayden 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are not married, let the mother of your child decide.
You could hyphenate it. her's-yours.
I couldn't decide when I had my son. I was not married at the time and With his father. When the nurse came in and was asking about his name for his birth certificate ... that was when I decided. It seemed natural to have our baby have his father's last name....
Yes, I did marry him and we are still married after 14 years!
Good luck!
2007-10-24 04:58:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is a legal precedent for it. My daughter had a baby out of wedlock and they agreed if it was a girl it would have her last name and if it was a boy it would have his. Fortunately, since the relationship did not work out, it was a girl. In most state's I think it the choice of the woman giving birth.
2007-10-24 02:36:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by AKA FrogButt 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I'll tell you what I think but you probably won't like my answer.
Since you aren't married to your GF I'd say she has a right to name it whatever she wishes. You won't be able to do a thing about it. She has a right to give it her last name (I probably would too). I have a BF now and I'm 18 weeks along. I constantly think about this but since we aren't married and if we arent by the time I give birth I'll probably give it my last name.
Good Luck.
2007-10-24 03:33:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by sweetypie9 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that it should have your last name. If you two do get married in the future, you will have to go through lots of paper work to have your child's name changed.
2007-10-24 02:18:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aumatra 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your son should have your last name. I would insist if I were you. Why not adopt her 6 year old and get married and you all can have the same last name.
2007-10-24 02:46:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Caleb's Mom 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Any name the two of you decide on is fine. There's no set rule that applies here, it's the parents decision. I personally think that if you can't decide, then a hyphenated name or a combination of the two is acceptable
2007-10-24 02:17:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by danili 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you dont plan on marrying this woman, than she should give the child her last name. It would be easier and less confusing for the siblings.
2007-10-24 02:37:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brown Eyed Girl 5
·
1⤊
0⤋