I mean, freedom aint free, and we're fighting them over there so we don't fight them here, and he IS a uniter, not a divider! I love bush.
2007-10-24 01:40:55 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No way. :o) Anarchy would be better at this point! hehe :o)
2007-10-24 01:57:49 · answer #1 · answered by Linz ♥ VT 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
So, tell us, how are ALL of those bad nasty thems going to get over here for us to fight? Are they all going to get on an airplane together and fly right into Kennedy airport without being shot down or something? Are they all going to board a huge ocean liner and sail right into Boston Harbor undetected? How are they going to get here in such huge numbers undetected and without being stopped? Where is homeland security? Where are our armed forces?
Yes, I will agree that Bush is an uniter. He has united the world against us. He has united most of this country against him and the GOP. Oh yes, he is, indeed, an uniter.
2007-10-24 02:45:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really wish the United States government was a monarchy, then we could ALWAYS have the old Bush-man as our leader and we wouldn't have to go through the motions of election (we all know the president is chosen by the Pope).
*sigh*...to make the poor poorer and the rich richer. What a beautiful world it would be...
2007-10-24 02:01:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I didn't vote for the dumb a$$ the first two times. Even if he could who would be stupid enough to vote for him a third time. Morons & idiots. Can't wait til he is out of the White House.
2007-10-24 03:22:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah Bush is great. I truly like it when he doesn't sign a bill to help more then 30 million poor people with their heating bills this winter or when he vetos the schip bill to help unisured kids. That's great! I think he is even better that when doesn't sign those bills because we have no money, he goes and asks Congress (on the same day) that he needs $245 billion dollars to fund his war.
Yeah he is awesome, hope they will amend the constitution to keep him around as long as Castro.
2007-10-24 02:28:03 · answer #5 · answered by traceilicious 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
There is much dispute that he was ever 'elected' for his first term. You can honestly see what the last 7 years have been and want more of it? You are a masochist.
2007-10-24 02:29:49 · answer #6 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You'd be fighting us ALL over there if you did - GWB will only be happy when he turns the entire planet into a cinder.
You're fighting "them" over there because GWB lied about weapons of mass destruction and wanted to play General - after managing to get out of having to go to Vietnam and actually fight himself.
He's a uniter all right - he's managed to unite most of the world AGAINST the US after destroying all the good will that the world had for the US after 9/11.
I'm afraid your name & the statement "I love bush" says it all.
OK - no best answer for this one.....................................
2007-10-24 01:49:15 · answer #7 · answered by fordfalcon1953 3 · 7⤊ 3⤋
That’s very funny. I think Bush should have been impeached or should be impeached before the end of his second term, so a third term is not exactly what I have in mind.
2007-10-24 01:54:47 · answer #8 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Nope, George W. is a perfect example of why term limits are a good thing.
2007-10-24 01:53:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You have got to be kidding. Can you please get off the fighting over there so we don't fight here ride. Take yourself over to ground zero and LOOK. We are all ready fighting here. Geez
No president, bad or good should serve more then two terms
2007-10-24 01:50:35 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋
All of the enemies of U.S.A would love it,Bush is really destroying the states by his decisions.
2007-10-24 02:28:44 · answer #11 · answered by M.Dusoqi 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋