English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you agree and/or disagree?

Why do you agree and/or disagree?

2007-10-24 01:07:41 · 14 answers · asked by Kay d 3 in Arts & Humanities History

Most informative will get the 10 points

2007-10-24 01:09:27 · update #1

This questions is for someone who want 10 points

2007-10-24 01:12:27 · update #2

You still have a change to answer I am talking all answers into consideration until tomorrow

2007-10-24 01:26:09 · update #3

14 answers

Kay


Which particular topic are you not doing your homework for this week?

There are plenty of websites that will give you all this information just as quickly and easily as asking here and it would be your own work.

Just get on with it and quit complaining.

2007-10-24 01:11:31 · answer #1 · answered by LimeyinAmerica 3 · 4 1

NO

The Treaty of Versailles and the reconstitution of the German Empire was the reason Hitler came to power, that was what the German People wanted was for Germany to be a power again as it was in 1918.

The depression may have made the problems more acute but it was not the reason people supported Hitler. Hitlers desire to create a third Reich was what people supported, most Germans felt betrayed by the Treaty of Versailles, there felt there country was being pillaged through the treaty and the depression only amplified the discontent.

2007-10-24 02:35:40 · answer #2 · answered by DeSaxe 6 · 0 0

At first no,then eventually that was his driving force, he used that to appeal to the Germains. Hitler lost the election during the depression. But gained huge support because of the depression. His party went from the smallest to the second largest. Then a few years later, through political tatics became the chancler of Germainy, gaining even more power, then systematically taking over the states government. Now he could focus on why he entered politics in the first place, his hatred of Jews. It began with a simple boycott, that would end years later in the greatest tragedy in human history.
JMH..Kindly lighten up! Don't you have better things to worry about!

2007-10-24 01:45:10 · answer #3 · answered by camern11 3 · 0 0

Disagree. It was a factor, but the reason people voted for Hitler was because he was an extremely good orator and because of the demeaning restrictions imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles. People wanted revenge and wanted their self-respect back and Hitler seemed to be able to provide both.

2007-10-24 01:19:32 · answer #4 · answered by Velouria 6 · 1 0

the finished melancholy because it substitute into widely used in the USA did not have something to do with Hitler & the Nazis. Germany substitute into in only a touch an financial funk to boot on the time, and because conflict is a great answer to financial problems, he went to conflict with Poland in 1939. you need to truly seek for advice from some greater beneficial web content than Yahoo solutions nonetheless. and not Wikipedia. attempt some on line encyclopedias. additionally, approximately which includes those above words, no one here is going to place in writing an essay for you!

2016-10-04 11:49:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The July 31, 1932, election produced a major victory for Hitler’s National Socialist Party. The party won 230 seats in the Reichstag, making it Germany’s largest political party, but it still fell short of a majority in the 608-member body.

On the basis of that victory, Hitler demanded that President Hindenburg appoint him chancellor and place him in complete control of the state. Otto von Meissner, who worked for Hindenburg, later testified at Nuremberg,

Hindenburg replied that because of the tense situation he could not in good conscience risk transferring the power of government to a new party such as the National Socialists, which did not command a majority and which was intolerant, noisy and undisciplined.

Political deadlocks in the Reichstag soon brought a new election, this one in November 6, 1932. In that election, the Nazis lost two million votes and 34 seats. Thus, even though the National Socialist Party was still the largest political party, it had clearly lost ground among the voters.

Attempting to remedy the chaos and the deadlocks, Hindenburg fired Papen and appointed an army general named Kurt von Schleicher as the new German chancellor. Unable to secure a majority coalition in the Reichstag, however, Schleicher finally tendered his resignation to Hindenburg, 57 days after he had been appointed.

On January 30, 1933, President Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler chancellor of Germany. Although the National Socialists never captured more than 37 percent of the national vote, and even though they still held a minority of cabinet posts and fewer than 50 percent of the seats in the Reichstag, Hitler and the Nazis set out to to consolidate their power. With Hitler as chancellor, that proved to be a fairly easy task.

2007-10-24 01:16:58 · answer #6 · answered by finals23 2 · 0 2

Finals23: Kindly cite the source of this essay, which you have pasted here verbatim and without attribution. This is both unethical and illegal. Just because you found it on the Internet does not mean it’s in the public domain.

For the rest of you, here is his source:

How Hitler Became a Dictator
by Jacob G. Hornberger, Posted June 28, 2004

(Even the original author acknowledged that he was basing his essay on William Shirer's book "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich")

Found on two websites:

http://www.usenetpolitics.com/showthread.php?t=28068

and

http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0403a.asp

2007-10-24 01:30:41 · answer #7 · answered by JMH 4 · 3 1

There were a lot of issues. I think the treatment of Germany after WW I had a lot to do with the German people looking for revenge. The treaty of Versaille is a model for how to make a bad situation worse.

2007-10-24 01:11:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not really. Hitler was highly pissed off about the excessive amount of reparations Germany had to pay following WW1. The economic depression which followed was a direct result of this.

2007-10-24 01:13:34 · answer #9 · answered by captbullshot 5 · 0 1

When Germany was saddled by debt and various types of punishment at the end of WW I the seeds of WW II were sown; Der Fuhrer was just the messenger that carried the seeds.

2007-10-24 03:34:38 · answer #10 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 0 0

Ehhh....not really. He came at a time when Germany was really suffering from the effects of World War I. They lost, they were paying huge sanctions, they lost land and were humiliated. Wrong as he was, he was known for being a spirited public speaker who rallied re-instilled a sense of nationalism and a common enemy....anyone who wasn't his definition of Aryan (even though that was an inaccurate definition). When you have the whole world telling you "shame on yourselves" and a crazy f!!king nut saying "you're the greatest".....well, we see what happened there.

2007-10-24 01:18:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers